tlg1903

confirmed on the club website. Great news

Agreed on all counts. I hadn't realised Logan was suspended in my OP and Jack is easily the best option for the RB position IMO. I would go Brown Jack Taylor Considine Shinnie Storie Maclean Mcginn Smith Pawlett Rooney What I think we will actually get is Brown Shinnie taylor reynolds considine Jack Storie mcginn maclean Rooney Church

They are in pish form and played midweek so despite no Hayes you have to fancy a win here especially given some of their defensive injuries. There's some big question marks about how we will line up and its big match for a few players in particular. Will Taylor start or will DM keep faith with him? Hard one to call this actually but he must surely have been thinking about it. Options are Considine and McKenna but we know he doesn't like the CB's having the same dominant foot but does he have enough confidence in McKenna to bench taylor for him? He has been ruthless before in dropping players but I reckon he might Taylor another chance. Personally I would be tempted to chuck McKenna in though on the grounds that he is unlikely to be worse than Taylor against ICT or an out of position Considine. The noises have been that at least one or both of Flood and Jack (BTW did anyone ask jack about his injury the other night Tyrant?) will be back for this game so will they come back in and alongside whom? I really don't think Storie should be dropped as has looked like the midfielder we have been lacking quite a few times already. I have to admit the prospect of Jack and Storie in the centre piques the curiosity a little though. In golf club Main Bus to Schneck I really want to see a reaction after the last game and we may just get it. It would be nice to give them a bit of a doing after their last visit but it will probably be 2 - 0 Maclean (he's due a goal) and Rooney.

Ramsey is a player, would love to see him leave arsenal for a club with ambition. The rest I agree with.

Nice one tyrant, thanks for that

I disagree, mccurry was worse because he had a rangers agenda. Collum is incompetent but I don't think he's bent

Being a ref is a fairly thankless task a lot of the time so I try not to ref bash too much despite being highly frustrated by the growing level of incompetence in Scottish referee's in general. Collum is indefensible though. He's so awful so often, that he's going to the euro's would be hilarious if it wasn't so pathetic. Ironically though he may do so badly at a euro's game that the international spotlight on him will force the SFA to act. The only thing you can say in his defence is that he's not mike hun cunt mccurry

No worries. Did the film make much mention of his adoption manc?

yeah, very much this.

Have you ever seen pirates of silicon valley manc? It's pretty much a straight to dvd movie about the rise of Microsoft and Apple but I really enjoyed it.

That's a really hard one to take.

Oooooooooft Some build up play by Storie. Starting to think missing out on tansey was a good thing

Quietly confident about this one, DM will have been reminding then about our last visit and I expect a cold ruthlessness tonight as a result. A well fought but in the end comfortable 2-0 win

Heard that on the radio earlier, let's hope spurs don't take all 3 today

I miss seebass abd his loony random comments

Ooooft. That has to be the most random post I've seen on DT since Seebass stopped posting.

Pretty easy so far

Thanks edit. That's highly entertaining, things must be grim for him to be calling a penalty and a red card against his beloved Celtic. Gillhaus kept the fire stoked nicely with his 'I've not seen scottish football in quite a while but aye, celtic are a bit pish eh?' rhetoric.

Sill not seen that yet

Interesting that Shinnie got the armband in the first place given Reynolds is vice captain.

Not playing well at all

Really hope church starting doesn't mean Rooney on the wing

If we win comfortably tonight he might find the invite in the post tomorrow

On topic, i think this one will run for a wee bit. One thing I did take from CTO was that it's a fair point if the agent was contractually obliged to stay silent about the release clause. That Aberdeen's source was the agent is welcome information but we can still only guess at the specifics of the clause. I do wonder if there is any kind breach of contract ruling in Tanseys favour (and if it was I think we can agree that's a pretty massive breach of contract if so) if he would then have the option to tear up his contract up and sign for us as a free agent.

Much like the place itself Al. Truth be told i don't think they ever got over how long it took them to get their first win, 21 games was it?