OrlandoDon Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 29 minutes ago, RicoS321 said: No it isn't. Well, not according to the maps our governments let us see. Perhaps you have different ones. Apologies for the source. Not as accurate as my trundle wheel, but this is what I mean. Quote
Don Julio Posted 36 minutes ago Report Posted 36 minutes ago The thing about all this is that the US already has a right to position troops in Greenland and has in fact reduced troop numbers from about 2000 to 200 I think. You can maintain a nuclear umbrella without having to invade someone else’s territory. Quote
OrlandoDon Posted 23 minutes ago Report Posted 23 minutes ago 8 minutes ago, Don Julio said: The thing about all this is that the US already has a right to position troops in Greenland and has in fact reduced troop numbers from about 2000 to 200 I think. You can maintain a nuclear umbrella without having to invade someone else’s territory. Pure speculation/opinion, but I suspect the US hand is being forced by increased Russian activity in the region. US is also leaning much more on allies for support with the threat of tariffs (eg denmark) for whom the US provides military and or financial support. I think trump is the type that’s now asking other countries for support in return for continued benefits from the US. I think the feeling is that the US has provided support to other counties with little return, now they are being asked to do more, including support with Greenland. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.