Crazy American Politics

[OrlandoDon]

29 minutes ago, RicoS321 said:

No it isn't. Well, not according to the maps our governments let us see. Perhaps you have different ones.

Apologies for the source. Not as accurate as my trundle wheel, but this is what I mean.

[Don Julio]

The thing about all this is that the US already has a right to position troops in Greenland and has in fact reduced troop numbers from about 2000 to 200 I think.

You can maintain a nuclear umbrella without having to invade someone else’s territory.

[OrlandoDon]

8 minutes ago, Don Julio said:

The thing about all this is that the US already has a right to position troops in Greenland and has in fact reduced troop numbers from about 2000 to 200 I think.

You can maintain a nuclear umbrella without having to invade someone else’s territory.

Pure speculation/opinion, but I suspect the US hand is being forced by increased Russian activity in the region. US is also leaning much more on allies for support with the threat of tariffs (eg denmark) for whom the US provides military and or financial support. I think trump is the type that’s now asking other countries for support in return for continued benefits from the US. I think the feeling is that the US has provided support to other counties with little return, now they are being asked to do more, including support with Greenland.

[RicoS321]

3 hours ago, OrlandoDon said:

Apologies for the source. Not as accurate as my trundle wheel, but this is what I mean.

I'd have thought that as a Scot, you'd be a bit reticent to equate North America to the US! It's like being called English. The Canada part being fairly significant when discussing Greenland. Trump will almost certainly view Canada as the next logical acquisition (because it is) if Greenland is not fought for. With their capturing of Venezuelan heavy oil, it would certainly make the acquisition easier.

[Mason89]

He’s really starting to unravel. This is the start of the end. 
Buckle up 

[manc_don]

I thought everyone knew that the cartels were US / CIA funded and developed? They allow the drugs to come in.

[Slim]

And that’s another pardoned drug dealer to add to the list.

[Jute]

17 hours ago, OrlandoDon said:

Pure speculation/opinion, but I suspect the US hand is being forced by increased Russian activity in the region. US is also leaning much more on allies for support with the threat of tariffs (eg denmark) for whom the US provides military and or financial support. I think trump is the type that’s now asking other countries for support in return for continued benefits from the US. I think the feeling is that the US has provided support to other counties with little return, now they are being asked to do more, including support with Greenland.

Only one member of NATO has ever triggered article 5 to get other countries to come to their aid and that was the U.S. and NATO did. This includes Denmark who suffered the highest per capita casualty rate of any of the countries so to claim that U.S. gets nothing from other countries is laughable on that basis alone. Then look at the money the U.S. defence industries get from NATO members since its inception. It is again farcical to suggest no to financial benefit from this. The US already the right to increase number of troops in its bases in Greenland if they are worried about security and alleged increase Russian activity (same Russians his policies are assisting in Ukraine but that’s a different discussion) but it should be pointed out that NATO have said no Russian ships have been in Greenland waters for a number of years. This is nothing to do with security it’s all to do with the Poundland Mussolini wanting to be able to say he has made America greater again by expanding territory. He wants to get his face on Mount Rushmore like the other U.S. Presidents that have expanded the U.S. for his ego nothing more. 

[Mason89]

I don’t think the senile orange nonce has factored in that the Boghead Youth Army (hated but rated) could take faslane in 2 minutes 

How secure is Greenland looking then!? Prick 

[CurlsLikeTattie]

19 hours ago, OrlandoDon said:

Im not 100% certain but I read that with the arctic melting you could see about 40% of world trade using the waters around Greenland. 

 

Maybe he should focus more on reducing greenhouse gasses and the slowing/reversing the climate emergency to stop the ice caps melting, ergo stopping the baddies from getting through that way.

But no, "drill baby, drill"

[swaddon]

24 minutes ago, CurlsLikeTattie said:

Maybe he should focus more on reducing greenhouse gasses and the slowing/reversing the climate emergency to stop the ice caps melting, ergo stopping the baddies from getting through that way.

But no, "drill baby, drill"

There's no money to be made from helping the planet.

If there was, then there would be no climate crisis.