Tom Widdows is not a doctor, nurse, physio, chiropractor or anything to do with medical science and so his thoughts on a players future playing career should never be taken as fact. He also has nothing against any of the current Playing squad and wants them all fit and healthy.
But if someone has spent the best part of a year recovering from an injury returns to the first team squad, plays one game then misses the next one due to injury I think 'seen this before somewhere'
From this the following can perhaps be concluded, suspected, guessed (whatever you wish to call it)
1) He still had not fully recovered and should not have played against St Johnstone
2) He had fully recovered but the injury has left him prone to niggling injuries (perhaps because it weakened something or he is worried he will do it again so overcompensates) which will see him in and out of the team on a regular basis.
3) He has fully recovered, theres nothing wrong with his legs etc and his injury is illness or something out of the Kirk Broadfoot cookery book.
If he is back next sunday then this discussions gets put on hold. If he plays every game for the rest of the season then its over. But if he is still injured for the celtic game how many of you will start to think something similar?