mizer Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 As Derek McInnes comes in for the last 5 games of the season, which of the first team do you want to see him keep at Aberdeen and who (if any) would you like for him to let go? Vote for the players you want to keep and leave off those who you don't. List derived from the squad list minus young players who have only made a few appearances. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mentorred Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 Oops guess I should have read the thread I voted for who I would get rid off and was ready to ask which 6 people voted for McGinn Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jute Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 Why the fuck do folk want Magennis to stay. Cunt cannot even master the basics of football. I now await the tries hard responses. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc_don Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 I fucked up, much like Mentor, I read it who i'd get rid Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mentorred Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 Why the fuck do folk want Magennis to stay. Cunt cannot even master the basics of football. I now await the tries hard responses. He is still young and I think at time shows potential. A big striker who should let the defence know he is there. Maybe McInnes can get the best out of him. I say give him till the end of next season and if there is not any progress then he can go. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CtS Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 I read it as "Which players should McInnes be", not confusing at all. I think he should be Niall McGinn because he's ace. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizer Posted March 25, 2013 Author Share Posted March 25, 2013 Sorry fowks, you can now change your votes Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
maverick sheep Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 Why the fuck do folk want Magennis to stay. Cunt cannot even master the basics of football. I now await the tries hard responses. the guy who got two goals and an assist at celtic park just there? fuck knows. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CtS Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 I'm astonished that anyone voted for Hughes, he has been absolutely rotten for months. Get rid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrant Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 I'm astonished that anyone voted for Hughes, he has been absolutely rotten for months. Get rid. Agreed. Hate the cunt. Lazy shite. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDU_64 Posted March 26, 2013 Share Posted March 26, 2013 For players that he should be keeping, I've gone for - Jack, Robertson, Anderson, Considine, Milsom, McGinn, Hayes, Shaughnessy, Pawlett, Osbourne and Reynolds. Looking at that players there, you've got a good basis of a side but just needs small repairs e.g a right back, a keeper, striker etc. Magennis can get to fuck. He's got very little footballing ability and all he has got is being built like a brick shit house and can run fairly fast. If scoring at Celtic Park is a barometer for how good you are as a professional footballer then John Stewart and Zdrillic have been cracking players for us! Using that performance as an example of why we should be keeping him conveniently hides the fact that for the most of his Aberdeen career, he has been dung. Langfield can also go. A decent shot stopper who will give you on average of 3 or 4 howlers a season, a bottler of the biggest variety and can't kick worth a fuck. How he has managed at AFC for so long is beyond me, maybe that's an indication of the club more than anything. His command of the box, positioning and coming off his line is absolutely terrible. Rae and Vernon are two players that if they stayed, I wouldn't be fussed but if we can get better replacements then cheerio. Rae started the season well but has started to look his age. Vernon is one that's a bit harder. Obviously a goal scorer but hasn't been able to score for love or money this season and even his other general play has gone tits up. He really has been awful this season, if he can get back to the form he showed in his first two seasons then he will be a prized asset again. If he continues with the form he has showed this season, then he is as much of a hinderance than he is helpful. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizer Posted March 27, 2013 Author Share Posted March 27, 2013 Current top 3: Jack McGinn Hayes Current bottom 3: Clark Fallon Naysmith Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sooth_stander Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 Hayes? Jonny Hayes? or Melvyn Hayes? I've seen nothing from the former to justify keeping him on. Gash since day 1. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glasgow sheep Posted March 28, 2013 Share Posted March 28, 2013 Jack, Anderson, Considine, Milsom, McGinn, Hayes, Shaughnessy, Pawlett, Osbourne, Magennis,Reynolds. Probably a bit unfair on Robertson and deserves another year to see if he will work out. Magennis has looked our most dangerous forward in recent games, far more direct and physical than anyone else in the team and bags of enthusiasm and confidence which almost no one has. Not the best skilled player by a long shot but he has come on leaps and bounds this year and if Brown concentrated on playing him in his best position striker (or perhaps impact sub) rather than fucking about with him at rb, lb, rw, lw,cb then he would have had more game time, and I would argue on recent performances deserved more game time recently anyway. His performance was just one break away goal like Stewart or Zdricllic. He scored two, set up one and threatened throughout. Much like Mackie and Langfield before him, people seem more intent on hating for hating's sake than actually seeing what he contributes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc_don Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 New Aberdeen boss Derek McInnes will tell any out of contract player who doesn't wish to stay at Pittodrie that they won't feature again this season. (Sun) Absolutely! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewart Posted April 10, 2013 Share Posted April 10, 2013 Which of them won't want to stay? I'd imagine only Osbourne or Milsom. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizer Posted April 11, 2013 Author Share Posted April 11, 2013 Does anyone know whos all out of contract? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrant Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Does anyone know whos all out of contract? Naysmith, Josh, Milsom, Rae, Fallon (cunt), Osbourne and possibly Megginson and Pawlett? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kowalski Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Why are we referring to Aberdeen players as cunts? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stewart Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 STV say the list below but I'm sure Clark has another year left. Aberdeen[/size] [/color]Out of Contract:[/size] Isaac Osbourne, Gary Naysmith, Chris Clark, Gavin Rae, Rory Fallon, Rob Milsom, Josh Magennis, Mitch Megginson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrant Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Why are we referring to Aberdeen players as cunts? Because the cunt posted some religious nonsensical garbage on Facebook and when I politely pointed out a slight flaw I was blocked without even an attempt at an adult debate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kowalski Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Because the cunt posted some religious nonsensical garbage on Facebook and when I politely pointed out a slight flaw I was blocked without even an attempt at an adult debate. Did he? What did he post? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrant Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Did he? What did he post? Some horse shit about the bible knowing stuff before science. For example the earth being round. The same earth that they believe to be just 6,000 years old. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc_don Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 Some horse shit about the bible knowing stuff before science. For example the earth being round. The same earth that they believe to be just 6,000 years old. To be fair, that doesn't make him a cunt, just a daftie. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tyrant Posted April 11, 2013 Share Posted April 11, 2013 To be fair, that doesn't make him a cunt, just a daftie. Aye but his infantile reaction was cuntish more than the nonsense he was posting. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.