Edinburghdon Posted November 12, 2008 Share Posted November 12, 2008 Certainly played as a striker, or in the hole behind the strikers for pretty much all of the game last night Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CtS Posted November 12, 2008 Share Posted November 12, 2008 Certainly played as a striker, or in the hole behind the strikers for pretty much all of the game last night Played in the hole just in front of Helen st Mirrens rearguard. Difficult job in such damp conditions. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superstar Tradesman Posted November 12, 2008 Share Posted November 12, 2008 Certainly played as a striker, or in the hole behind the strikers for pretty much all of the game last night Seve's played at the back plenty but that doesn't make him a defender. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizer Posted November 12, 2008 Author Share Posted November 12, 2008 http://www.afc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/Squad/firstTeam/0,,10284,00.html 22-Sone Aluko-Midfielder Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Bobby Clark Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 22-Sone Aluko-Midfielder Right, get his goals off the strikers tally. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kowalski Posted November 13, 2008 Share Posted November 13, 2008 He very rarely plays up front for us, he's a midfielder by and large. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Bobby Clark Posted November 17, 2008 Share Posted November 17, 2008 After 16/11/08 Defence 5 Midfield 5 Strikers 8 Considine 1 Diamond 1 Mulgrew 3 MacDonald 2 Young 1 Aluko 2 Maguire 1 Mackie 4 Miller 3* (* 2 pen) Executive decision taken, Aluko's a midfielder. Going by Redweb, the team's strikers are listed as Miller, Mackie, Maguire and Wright. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kowalski Posted November 17, 2008 Share Posted November 17, 2008 Going by Redweb, the team's strikers are listed as Miller, Mackie, Maguire and Wright. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajja Posted November 17, 2008 Share Posted November 17, 2008 After 16/11/08 Defence 5 Midfield 5 Strikers 8 Considine 1 Diamond 1 Mulgrew 3 MacDonald 2 Young 1 Aluko 2 Maguire 1 Mackie 4 Miller 3* (* 2 pen) Executive decision taken, Aluko's a midfielder. Going by Redweb, the team's strikers are listed as Miller, Mackie, Maguire and Wright. I'll take the fucking executive decisions in this thread if you don't mind Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
One Bobby Clark Posted November 19, 2008 Share Posted November 19, 2008 I'll take the fucking executive decisions in this thread if you don't mind Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizer Posted November 30, 2008 Author Share Posted November 30, 2008 After 29/11/08 Defence 5 Midfield 6 Strikers 9 Considine 1 Diamond 1 Mulgrew 3 MacDonald 3 Young 1 Aluko 2 Maguire 1 Mackie 4 Miller 4* (* 3 pen) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajja Posted November 30, 2008 Share Posted November 30, 2008 Strikers 9 Non-strikers 11 Poor show from the boys up top Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajja Posted December 14, 2008 Share Posted December 14, 2008 After 13/12/08 Defence 5 Midfield 6 Strikers 11 Considine 1 Diamond 1 Mulgrew 3 MacDonald 3 Young 1 Aluko 2 Maguire 1 Mackie 4 Miller 6* (* 4 pen) Non-strikers 11 goals Strikers 11 goals Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TENEMENTFUNSTER Posted December 14, 2008 Share Posted December 14, 2008 Bit unfair to qualify Miller's goals as some goals and some pens. They're all goals. Someone has to have the necessary to put them away. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boboisared Posted December 14, 2008 Share Posted December 14, 2008 Bit unfair to qualify Miller's goals as some goals and some pens. They're all goals. Someone has to have the necessary to put them away. Exactly. Thats been annoying me for a while. Are we gonig to qualify Mulgrews as free kicks then? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kowalski Posted December 14, 2008 Share Posted December 14, 2008 Are we going to qualify Maguires as sclaffs? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TENEMENTFUNSTER Posted December 14, 2008 Share Posted December 14, 2008 Are we going to qualify Maguires as sclaffs? Only if we can qualify him as a fitba player. He does seem to play very few games as a striker though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizer Posted December 14, 2008 Author Share Posted December 14, 2008 Bit unfair to qualify Miller's goals as some goals and some pens. They're all goals. Someone has to have the necessary to put them away. For this purpose I think it is quite valid. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glasgowdon Posted December 14, 2008 Share Posted December 14, 2008 A goal is a goal. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizer Posted December 14, 2008 Author Share Posted December 14, 2008 nah - a goal's a goal There was no "open play" caveat when the Hitmen were backed to bag 30 goals Its not affecting the total................... Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boboisared Posted December 14, 2008 Share Posted December 14, 2008 Another excuse to be negative. At the end of the season the top goal scorer charts won't have for example... Kris Boyd 30 (8 penalties). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizer Posted December 14, 2008 Author Share Posted December 14, 2008 but will be thrown in our faces by you at the end of the season if there's not 30 from open play Nope, I think its quite interesting as it shows the distribution of goals. The more information the more interesting it is. Another excuse to be negative. From my point of view you are the unhappy one Exactly. Thats been annoying me for a while. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boboisared Posted December 14, 2008 Share Posted December 14, 2008 Nope, I think its quite interesting as it shows the distribution of goals. The more information the more interesting it is. From my point of view you are the unhappy one Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edinburghdon Posted December 14, 2008 Share Posted December 14, 2008 Nope, I think its quite interesting as it shows the distribution of goals. The more information the more interesting it is. Geek! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TENEMENTFUNSTER Posted December 15, 2008 Share Posted December 15, 2008 Its not affecting the total................... Then let's just have the total then. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
️ Come on you Reds! ️
️ Come on you Reds! ️
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.