Skip to content

Scotland squad

No Shinnie or Christie???

 

Wtf Strachan.

 

I agree we should keep the same team who should've beaten England but bringing in Whittaker and excluding them?

 

Nuts

  • Replies 3.2k
  • Views 390.4k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • OxfordDon
    OxfordDon

    Thought Al had stopped going to games by then?

  • Aberdeen winning the Scottish Cup and Scotland qualifying for the World Cup within six months of each other, that's the dream. And yet, within those six months, both Jimmy Thelin and Steve Clarke

  • DonUnder
    DonUnder

    Appen Yorkshire people might ? 🤔  

Posted Images

Featured Replies

If anyone is interested the U21 game Tonight  is being shown on national teams youtube channel 17:30 kick off.

58 minutes ago, tup1 said:

? you’re pretty hard on him for one mistake as a youngster. He’s a good player, that’s all I’m concerned about.

We'll agree to disagree Tup

I've been consistent on my views about him.

42 minutes ago, BigAl said:

We'll agree to disagree Tup

I've been consistent on my views about him.

He's done his time. It seemed to be an isolated incident. I don't know the facts, but I don't necessarily think that not showing remorse is a sign of a bad person in anyway. For example, if I punched Rolf Harris, I probably wouldn't be that remorseful, but I would understand why it would be assault and expect to be punished for that. Out of interest, we're a club that gave a home to Goodwillie who didn't serve time for the acts described in his civil case. Were you okay with that at the time?

21 minutes ago, RicoS321 said:

He's done his time. It seemed to be an isolated incident. I don't know the facts, but I don't necessarily think that not showing remorse is a sign of a bad person in anyway. For example, if I punched Rolf Harris, I probably wouldn't be that remorseful, but I would understand why it would be assault and expect to be punished for that. Out of interest, we're a club that gave a home to Goodwillie who didn't serve time for the acts described in his civil case. Were you okay with that at the time?

No

And the comparison to Rolf Harris (hardly an innocent man) is irrelevant in this case.

Cowardly attack by Gallacher and his mate on a man numerous years their senior

I stick by, the no thanks to him being anywhere near Pittodrie as is my right to hold that opinion.

I thought he did well against decent quality attackers last night, I wonder what sort of bid Motherwell would accept for him is the question.

We should chance a £500k bid.

1 hour ago, BigAl said:

No

And the comparison to Rolf Harris (hardly an innocent man) is irrelevant in this case.

Cowardly attack by Gallacher and his mate on a man numerous years their senior

I stick by, the no thanks to him being anywhere near Pittodrie as is my right to hold that opinion.

Yes it is your right. I'm not questioning your right, just asking for explanation of your position.

There was no comparison to Rolf Harris, that was an example for illustration of the point, not a comparison. There was no conflation either, just to clarify. Although comparison is not the same as conflation either, which seems to be missed in modern day debate. I'll use another example if it helps: if I were to have punched Tony Blair, I probably wouldn't be that remorseful, but would understand....etc. 

The point is that you stated that Gallagher was not remorseful, and I'm interested to know how you know that to be the case, and why you think that is? From the pish in the press at the time, the judge said that he believeed it was out of character for Gallagher, which suggests that Gallagher would likely be quite remorseful if it was yer everyday drunken scrap that got out of hand and he lost it, or he was young/stupid/naive or whatever. The fact that you state that he isn't remorseful means that he thinks the guy did something fairly substantial to have merited it (rightly or wrongly) and that he'd do the same thing again. As I say, I can't really see enough in the newspaper reports to guage it, but you seem to have a fairly good grasp of it, which is why I'm curious (I'm definitely not doubting you). The remorse thing is fairly key, you're right, it says a lot about the guy. That's why I asked your thoughts on Goodwillie. I could think of reasons why Gallagher might have done what he did (although I wouldn't, obviously), but none that mitigate Goodwillie's actions as laid out in the civil case. 

I certainly widnae be paying £500K for a 30 year old though Tup.

I have to say I know it wasn't the best to watch last night but the big positive for me performance wise was I thought we looked like a Steve Clarke side for the first time last night.  Not a Steve Clarke side playing particularly well right enough but a Steve Clarke side nonetheless.  Some of the hyperbole that has followed is ridiculous, we got through and bar one chance in extra time didn't give them a sniff. From where we have come from and especially given it was a virgin defence I will take that all day long.  

1 hour ago, RicoS321 said:

Yes it is your right. I'm not questioning your right, just asking for explanation of your position.

There was no comparison to Rolf Harris, that was an example for illustration of the point, not a comparison. There was no conflation either, just to clarify. Although comparison is not the same as conflation either, which seems to be missed in modern day debate. I'll use another example if it helps: if I were to have punched Tony Blair, I probably wouldn't be that remorseful, but would understand....etc. 

The point is that you stated that Gallagher was not remorseful, and I'm interested to know how you know that to be the case, and why you think that is? From the pish in the press at the time, the judge said that he believeed it was out of character for Gallagher, which suggests that Gallagher would likely be quite remorseful if it was yer everyday drunken scrap that got out of hand and he lost it, or he was young/stupid/naive or whatever. The fact that you state that he isn't remorseful means that he thinks the guy did something fairly substantial to have merited it (rightly or wrongly) and that he'd do the same thing again. As I say, I can't really see enough in the newspaper reports to guage it, but you seem to have a fairly good grasp of it, which is why I'm curious (I'm definitely not doubting you). The remorse thing is fairly key, you're right, it says a lot about the guy. That's why I asked your thoughts on Goodwillie. I could think of reasons why Gallagher might have done what he did (although I wouldn't, obviously), but none that mitigate Goodwillie's actions as laid out in the civil case. 

I certainly widnae be paying £500K for a 30 year old though Tup.

Rico, I'm going to let it drop.

I have business connections close to this and feel it inappropriate to say any more.

I'll never be a fan.

On 08/10/2020 at 13:30, Madbadteacher said:

Call up for big ANDY!

Steve Clarke must be reading this board

Considines been called up.  Fucking delighted for him, well deserved. 

Paul mcginn from hibs too, don't know much about him.   Would love to see Griffiths added to the squad too but not counting any chickens

Yasssssssssssssssssssss, Andy. I'm heading down to Hampden to sit outside with a candle. Best defender in the world. In your face, McKenna.

Scotland 1-0 up at half time. Hornby with the goal.

2-0 Scotland McCrorie.

Got to say from the bits of the game I've seen I like the look of Hornby up front ?

Just now, BigAl said:

Got to say from the bits of the game I've seen I like the look of Hornby up front ?

He has been excellent 

Just now, BigAl said:

Got to say from the bits of the game I've seen I like the look of Hornby up front ?

And on cue, just got MOTM

2-0 win. Win game next game away to San Marino we will go top of group. Hornby deserved MOTM but he was run close by Ferguson and McCrorie who were both excellent. Also impressed by Tom McIntyre and Lewis Mayo at the back. Much more enjoyable watch than last night.

Bruce Anderson called up to U21 squad. 

I’m torn.

i really want to see Andy and Ross get full caps but I fear the risk of injury and almost don’t want them to play

3 hours ago, Madbadteacher said:

I’m torn.

i really want to see Andy and Ross get full caps but I fear the risk of injury and almost don’t want them to play

Nonsense. We need to be cashing in on prospects like Considine. A couple of goals and we could be looking at another £6 or 7 million added to his value.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.