Jump to content

Friday 20th June 2025 - SPFL 25/26 Fixtures Released

šŸ†ļø SCOTTISH CUP WINNERS 2024/25 šŸ†

baggy89

Members
  • Posts

    2,326
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    31

Everything posted by baggy89

  1. Presume Vlad will claim he can't pay due to not receiving the monies owed to them by the hun.
  2. Just to confirm the account no is 00741594 or is the 5 a 6?
  3. How legal would it he to fill in dd forms for a charity using the account number and sort code?
  4. ABERDEEN FOOTBALL THUGS ARRESTED FOR UNPROVOKED VIOLENCE TOWARDS DISABLED OLD FIRM FANS rangers close to liquidation
  5. What a load of utter tripe. The reason CVA's have not gone through in England is not because they have the football creditors rule as such it's because there hasn't been enough money in the pot to pay HMRC what they want after football debts have been paid first. Don't be drawn in by the weegia HMRC will in no way get NOTHING if the Huns are liquidated. HMRC will get a lot more than £0.10 in the pound they are No. 1 creditor Ibrox and Murray Park must be worth more than £0.10 in the pound of the money they are owed. As far as I can remember HMRC were not the major creditor in Motherwell or Dundee cases and so had no power to block the CVA's. This is not true in the huns case. Then we get into the fact that the £49 million Tax case hasn't even reached its conclusion and we are expected to believe that someone from HMRC is not only discussing an ongoing Tax case with a journalist but is alluding to the fact that an agreement is in place to accept only part payment - bollocks. I'd hazard a guess that the cost for the preparation of the case is getting on for a couple of million so why then go on to accept £4.9 million. Even the stuff about HMRC only dealing with the huns if Whyte is out of the picture seems a bit too convenient for sensationalist journalism for my liking.
  6. Surely he's the fourth with "cars to finance and debts to pay"? and I bet the one who offered to play for nothing is Healey or maybe Aluko.
  7. I may be wrong but I thought Aberdeen fan McIlroy made world number 1? I also realised world number 1001 (or whatever) and Aberdeen fan Paul Lawrie has also recently won a tournament.
  8. Wonder if the Tims could give the money owed to Dunfermline directly out of the ticket money they're withholding from the Huns?
  9. Just had a look and it appears to be available on the Tunein radio app. Just typed 810 MW into the search function and it's come up with BBC Radio Scotland MW
  10. I think the clue is in the sentence.
  11. Corrected for accuracy
  12. Are we taking him on trial?
  13. Looks like a contract to me. The only disappointing thing is that it does not mention that the payments need not be re-paid. If they did the huns would be proper fucked.
  14. http://sport.stv.tv/football/scottish-premier/rangers/298342-craig-whyte-statement-in-full/
  15. When did Noddy join the JMG protest group?
  16. SHHHHH! No one mention that Rocket Scientist is really Liu Xiaobo.
  17. baggy89

    Ecstasy

    Nae sure your were dropping E's then. Ecstasy Mother Fuckers
  18. Yes and I had assumed that this scheme had been designed in an attempt to get these people back to work. It may have been, but further reading shows that due to its poorly thought out nature and even poorer implementation it is not working that way. That said on the links Padre provided for every seemingly genuine tale of it's poor implementation and people being taken advantage of, there is at least one equivalent story that smacks of "It's not fair I've been made to work". It has to be said, however, I am looking at it from the point of view of an employer that has had just one genuine enquiry from someone looking for work, that has resulted in an employee that hasn't spent 5 of their first 6 days off sick before just not turning up any longer, in the last 5 months. And this at a time when unemployment is at it's highest since 1992 and me being at least 4 full time employee's down.
  19. I don't know how the scheme works but had assumed Tesco would be paying what they would pay normally with the exchequer making up the difference to equal what these people would normally receive in benefits. Is there any actual evidence that people are losing their jobs so this scheme can be abused? or is it much like how the Poles came over and everyone lost their jobs so the Poles could do it for less.
  20. It's not really working for free though is it? It's working to receive the benefits they are already receiving which in a number of cases will be worth more than Tesco will be paying those that they are already employing at their normal rate. I've lost a few members of staff over the last few years who were marginally better off (financially) sitting at home than they were going to work and given the same choice I'd probably do the same. I also pay a couple of quid over the minimum wage basic and more for night and weekend work.
  21. But not until next season. We had a player on trial at Cheltenham whose registration had been held by two teams this season before the second paid his contract up. He is now without a club as no-one can sign him. Barnes-Homer I think it was.
  22. REALLY hope this is true. If he is released he won't be able to play again this season. I presume we held his registration till the Huns signed him then the Huns held his registration so that makes two. Nae luck ye English Nigerian Catholic UVF sympathiser. #careergoingdownthepanquickerthanyourclub
×
×
  • Create New...