Nellie The Don

Do you think it dates back to 1991? They might have to replay the tennants sixes final.

R.I.P. Michael Marra.

London is a shithole. True story.

Nope. You need to be resident in Scotland.

Expats can't vote, no.

Mark Brown?

Fucking hell. As much as it amuses me to see the huns getting a taste of their own medicine for once, that's just common assault.

Pfft. Welcome to ma boaby.

Somewhat short-sited.

So Rangers go bust owing Hearts £800k, then reform and try to sign two players Hearts couldn't afford to keep. Good to see they've turned over a new leaf on the 'cheating' front. I hope Brechin kick them all over the park.

First of all the SPL need to pull their necks in over TV rights. 'Demanding' ownership of TV rights from another league? Get squarely tae fuck. Secondly McCoist et al need to realise they have no leverage whatsoever to accept or reject anything. The SPL can initiate an independent panel, and Rangers can get stripped of any titles they see fit. If off the back of it Sevco decide both literally and figuratively they don't want to play any more then no biggie. Brechin v Spartans or Cove would be a perfectly fine opening fixture.

Bombscare Ifil's stint at fullback. *shudder*

I would assume that is 'Rangers' as in oldco/d&p, and the money will end up eith the creditors. If penny one of it sees its way to Sevco, it would certainly establish a legal argument for HMRC et al to persue them for their £130M.

The nick Sevco are in, I reckon Stranraer have a better chance in any case.

I think the embargo only applied to over 18s.

Just seen Alan Maybury is a free agent. Worth a look?

Depressingly enough, half of those guys weren't born the last time Aberdeen won a trophy.

I'm not reading that. The first line alone made me feel nauseous. Go away Terry. I'm sure someone somewhere must need potatos peeled.

L) Hampden burned to the ground by an angry mob.

Hari kiri on the Hampden steps?

I'm fairly confident that they will, in practice though. They would just need to propose an amendment to the first proposal to include wording to specify entry at div 3 (I'm pretty sure I read somewhere that it's in the rules for such meetings that any member can do something like this), then vote to approve proposal 1, and reject proposal 2.

I'm pretty sure that crosses the finishing line in terms of a majority.

It would be shoking for human beings to take advantage like that, but for Sun reporters it actually shows quite a lot of level-headed restraint.