Jupiter Posted January 19 Report Posted January 19 (edited) 6 hours ago, Mason89 said: There’s plenty of options that could be done. Doing nothing isn’t one of them. Doing nothing is always a good option. The PM should try it more often, then he wouldn't make a mess of everything. Edited January 19 by Jupiter Quote
DonUnder Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 6 hours ago, TheDonbytheDee said: I Would go along with that. The yanks are very precious about their flags. Remember when Sinead O'connor burnt one on stage many years ago? Still wouldn't change anything sadly. Keith is only thinking on how to keep the 'special relationship', special. America can take Greenland tomorrow and fuck all the UK or the UK can do about it. Quote
TheDonbytheDee Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 5 hours ago, DonUnder said: They could sell off the bonds, along with other countries, to China preferably, but I doubt it would happen. We are too wedded to America and that has come at a price, which we are now seeing. There is little Starmer can do in this battle. I am sure talks are happening behind the scenes and hopefully Trump pulls back from taking Greenland, but I can't see it. He is too far into this now to back down. Quote
Mason89 Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 I’d imagine they’ll have a quiet word at the Davos works jolly. He’ll back pedal from it, he just needs a way to do it without losing face with the crayon munchers that vote for him Quote
DonUnder Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 Macron threatening the anti coercion instrument. Showing some cajónes perhaps it's a response to all the cheese eating surrender monkey jibes? But they don't have to sell off the bonds they only have to threaten to do so. Play poker with Trump and there's every chance he would shout 'snap!' 3 Quote
TheDonbytheDee Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 4 hours ago, DonUnder said: Macron threatening the anti coercion instrument. Showing some cajónes perhaps it's a response to all the cheese eating surrender monkey jibes? But they don't have to sell off the bonds they only have to threaten to do so. Play poker with Trump and there's every chance he would shout 'snap!' But we are dealing with a deranged person, who has surrounded himself with even more deranged people. I think he and his cabal of cunts have passed the point of no return now. I hope the EU find some balls to deal with it, as I wouldn't be expecting anything from the UK. Quote
DonUnder Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 18 minutes ago, TheDonbytheDee said: But we are dealing with a deranged person, who has surrounded himself with even more deranged people. I think he and his cabal of cunts have passed the point of no return now. I hope the EU find some balls to deal with it, as I wouldn't be expecting anything from the UK. That is true but I reckon make Wall St and the $ wobble (OK the world catches a cold) and he's gone. Sure it's a risk but if Europe is smart about this they can possibly set themselves up as the leading economic power. The UK could .... oh wait. Quote
Jupiter Posted January 20 Report Posted January 20 I see Macron has got a black eye, did his "wife" hit him again? Quote
InversneckieDob Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 On 20/01/2026 at 19:30, Jupiter said: I see Macron has got a black eye, did his "wife" hit him again? Probably not, but thanks for the edgy take. It's good to know what the tabloid-fodder are believing. Quote
Jupiter Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 6 hours ago, InversneckieDob said: Probably not, but thanks for the edgy take. It's good to know what the tabloid-fodder are believing. How is it edgy, dId you not see his wife hitting him on a plane last year? Quote
Don Julio Posted January 25 Report Posted January 25 You don’t think putting wife in inverted commas was edgy? Quote
Mason89 Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 It’s nice to know that Reform are even worse at politics than Labour & the Tories They’re basically the party that lost the last election in a landslide. Good work Nigel Quote
swaddon Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 All these Tories signing for Reform just want to get back into power by any means necessary. Quote
2stars Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 21 minutes ago, swaddon said: All these Tories signing for Reform just want to get back into power by any means necessary. Poor Nigel starting to realise he is now the leader of the party that failed previously- wonder if he will use the same anti-immigration messages to stop defecting tories before they bring him down Can actually see the Liberals and the greens doing well by default Quote
CurlsLikeTattie Posted January 26 Report Posted January 26 1 hour ago, swaddon said: All these Tories signing for Reform just want to get back into power by any means necessary. I'm ok as long as they are signing for reform and not The Dons Quote
TheDonbytheDee Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Who would have thought, that when they agreed to release the Epstein files, the first political casualty could be Starmer. 2 Quote
Mason89 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 20 minutes ago, TheDonbytheDee said: Who would have thought, that when they agreed to release the Epstein files, the first political casualty could be Starmer. Definitely not him, which just makes it’s funnier Just to double the laughs, the wee scrote most likely to benefit from Starmer going would be Streeting, but he’s fucked himself over too. As has Sarwar up here. Great stuff, they all thoroughly deserve it. Perhaps we may see some blue forensic tents appear in some gardens, or is that a bit over the top? Quote
TheDonbytheDee Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 11 minutes ago, Mason89 said: Definitely not him, which just makes it’s funnier Just to double the laughs, the wee scrote most likely to benefit from Starmer going would be Streeting, but he’s fucked himself over too. As has Sarwar up here. Great stuff, they all thoroughly deserve it. Perhaps we may see some blue forensic tents appear in some gardens, or is that a bit over the top? I reckon another 'Ferry Fiasco' headline must be incoming soon, with Holyrood elections due in May. Quote
Mason89 Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago 17 minutes ago, TheDonbytheDee said: I reckon another 'Ferry Fiasco' headline must be incoming soon, with Holyrood elections due in May. It’s the Queen Elizabeth Hospital scandal that’s came out the unionist grumble bingo machine They seem to ignore Labours part in it though. It was interesting to see Michelle McGintys name appear on the list. This is a councillor who thought she didn’t have to pay council tax because she was on the council. She also campaigned to build one of Scotlands biggest secondary schools on Levengrove Park (google it, it’s lovely) all because she doesn’t drive and a bus would get her nearer. Big brain Labour 4D chess stuff Quote
Slim Posted 44 minutes ago Report Posted 44 minutes ago 1 hour ago, TheDonbytheDee said: Who would have thought, that when they agreed to release the Epstein files, the first political casualty could be Starmer. If we had anyone actually interested in holding Reform Ltd to account, it would be the end for Farage as well, he seems to be all over the files in a political inference context. BBC seem far more interested in “At Home With The Farages” puff pieces showing what a ruddy nice bloke to have a pint with Our Nige is while the Labour government are perfectly content to let GB News break all kinds of broadcasting regulations on a daily basis and despite the mounting evidence that Brexit was planned by these outside influences from the very beginning have no interest whatsoever in addressing that head on. 2 Quote
Kowalski Posted 44 minutes ago Report Posted 44 minutes ago 1 hour ago, TheDonbytheDee said: Who would have thought, that when they agreed to release the Epstein files, the first political casualty could be Starmer. It’s a load of bollocks. He’s getting a harder time than people who are actually in the files. Quote
Mason89 Posted 35 minutes ago Report Posted 35 minutes ago 1 minute ago, Kowalski said: It’s a load of bollocks. He’s getting a harder time than people who are actually in the files. If I knew Mandelson was a bad egg, had seen the photos with the birthday cake and the nonce & knew they were still friendly after Epsteins conviction, is it not asking too much for the Prime Minister to know it as well? They'll deny it but he & his cabinet all knew. They just didn’t care because they all worked together & shared the same goal. Destroying the Labour Party. Well done chaps, jobs a good ‘un. They just didn’t think for a second they’d be collateral. Which I find incredibly funny Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.