Skip to content

Crazy American Politics

Story #1

 

http://www.statepress.com/2012/03/12/senate-judiciary-committee-endorses-controversial-contraceptive-bill/

The Senate Judiciary Committee voted 6-2 Monday to endorse a controversial bill that would allow Arizona employers the right to deny health insurance coverage for contraceptives based on religious objections.

 

Arizona House Bill 2625, authored by Majority Whip Debbie Lesko, R-Glendale, would permit employers to ask their employees for proof of medical prescription if they seek contraceptives for non-reproductive purposes, such as hormone control or acne treatment.

 

“I believe we live in America. We don’t live in the  Soviet Union,” Lesko said. “So, government should not be telling the organizations or mom and pop employers to do something against their moral beliefs.”

 

Lesko said this bill responds to a contraceptive mandate in the federal Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act signed into law March 2010.

 

“My whole legislation is about our First Amendment rights and freedom of religion,” Lesko said. “All my bill does is that an employer can opt out of the mandate if they have any religious objections.”

 

Story#2

 

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/rick-santorum-wants-ban-hardcore-pornography-222833811.html

Rick Santorum wants to put an end to the distribution of pornography in the United States.

 

"America is suffering a pandemic of harm from pornography," Santorum's official website reads. "Pornography is toxic to marriages and relationships. It contributes to misogyny and violence against women. It is a contributing factor to prostitution and sex trafficking."

 

The former Pennsylvania senator states that, "as a parent, I am concerned about the widespread distribution of illegal obscene pornography and its profound effects on our culture."

 

Santorum criticized the Obama administration for turning "a blind eye ... to the scourge of pornography" and for refusing to enforce obscenity laws.

 

"If elected President, I will appoint an Attorney General who will do so," Santorum writes. "While the Obama Department of Justice seems to favor pornographers over children and families, that will change under a Santorum Administration."

  • Replies 1.2k
  • Views 218.1k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

  • RicoS321
    RicoS321

    Hilarious. Trump really is thick as shite. Everyone in the galaxy could see that coming before they even met. What an embarrassment of a nation (as most nations are). Two of life's absolute losers inv

  • We just mainly hear about their gestapo shooting Americans in the face, the child sex trafficking and fascist stuff but that’s good news about property taxes 

  • Mason89
    Mason89

    Also, all anti vaxxers are a menace to society 

Posted Images

Featured Replies

I see we have another 8 martyrs for the 2nd amendment.

Is it 'thoughts and prayers....no time to rush to judgement.....' or 'Muslim'?

 

I haven't checked.

It's weird how right wing types are concerned with protecting children right up until they're born.

I wonder what therapist Trump will say here?

1 minute ago, InversneckieDob said:

It's weird how right wing types are concerned with protecting children right up until they're born.

I wonder what therapist Trump will say here?

412 related pregnancy prosecutions since Roe vs Wade was overturned 

0 for the Epstein files 

The right will always try and say immigrants are a danger to women & children but that’s just projection. It’s always them. 

13 minutes ago, TheDonbytheDee said:

The head of the US Navy has now quit with immediate effect. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/ce9ml02g5k7o

Just reading the article and it looks like another prick is getting lined up to replace the one that’s leaving. It’s like a never ending conveyor belt. Have you seen the state of that Kevin Warsh getting lined up for the Fed? It’s like they’ve searched the nation to find the people with the most punchable faces and given them all a job in the administration 
 

 

Someone has tried to shoot Trump again.

6 minutes ago, swaddon said:

Someone has tried to shoot Trump again.

The whole thing smells a bit

It was quite funny seeing all those alpha males leave their wives hiding under the tables 

 

It’s just a panto  

IMG_1432.jpeg

9 minutes ago, Mason89 said:

The whole thing smells a bit

It was quite funny seeing all those alpha males leave their wives hiding under the tables 

 

Indeed it does.

Funny how it was the first time that Trump had actually attended this annual event in his entire time as President 🤔

Took place in the same hotel as the attempt on Reagan took place back in '81.

Yep he seems to have been pictured smirking while the shots started. However, he did do a rather large face plant when being escorted out so at least that was amusing. 

1 hour ago, swaddon said:

Someone has tried to shoot Trump again.

I'm going out on a limb here.....

No, they haven't. 

Just now, InversneckieDob said:

I'm going out on a limb here.....

No, they haven't. 

It just looked so staged. 

I think it was the term 'lone actor', that was the giveaway.

That's the thing. For a nation of gun-shaggers, they're really terrible at aiming the things. Maybe he should have put on a school uniform. 

7 hours ago, RicoS321 said:

That's the thing. For a nation of gun-shaggers, they're really terrible at aiming the things. Maybe he should have put on a school uniform. 

Is it the case (maybe not all states) that to get a gun you just need to reach a certain age and then head to Walmart?

The assumption being that your supersoaker teenage years automatically mean you become Dirty Harry/ a fully trained sniper the moment you touch an actual gun?

Id say imagine that being the case with driving a car but im no longer sure it already isnt

I saw the video of the boy running through security.

It must be a comforting thought for the president that he is protected by such a crack team of security guards.

10 hours ago, swaddon said:

Someone has tried to shoot Trump again.

No he didn't, he didn't even get into the same room as Trump.

Boy was a guest in the hotel. Up to his room with a bag full of shotguns, pistols and knives 🤣. The security around Trump sees pretty poor. They are either useless, arrogant or in on the conspiracy. Possibly all three 

7 hours ago, tom_widdows said:

Is it the case (maybe not all states) that to get a gun you just need to reach a certain age and then head to Walmart?

The assumption being that your supersoaker teenage years automatically mean you become Dirty Harry/ a fully trained sniper the moment you touch an actual gun?

Id say imagine that being the case with driving a car but im no longer sure it already isnt

Not quite. You need an ID, background check, permit, conceal carry permit if you intend to carry, many states require gun training and safety courses. Florida has a three day waiting period while they do a background check, California for example has a ten day waiting period.

7 hours ago, OrlandoDon said:

Not quite. You need an ID, background check, permit, conceal carry permit if you intend to carry, many states require gun training and safety courses. Florida has a three day waiting period while they do a background check, California for example has a ten day waiting period.

Oh well, that's okay then. 

Firing squads amongst the choices to be used, in new amendments to the death penalty in the US.

 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cg73l2d079ko

It’s not a great look for the leader of the free world 

IMG_1437.jpeg

2 hours ago, Mason89 said:

It’s not a great look for the leader of the free world 

IMG_1437.jpeg

Being a paedo isn't a barrier to success though, as the current chart topping biopic would confirm. 

10 minutes ago, RicoS321 said:

Being a paedo isn't a barrier to success though, as the current chart topping biopic would confirm. 

True. Always found it bizarre that some folk are given a free pass for it 

9 hours ago, Mason89 said:

It’s not a great look for the leader of the free world 

IMG_1437.jpeg

Great work from the interviewer “Oh do you think he was referring to you?”

That should really be a Frost/Nixon moment but it probably won’t. 
 

2 hours ago, Kowalski said:

Great work from the interviewer “Oh do you think he was referring to you?”

That should really be a Frost/Nixon moment but it probably won’t. 
 

Of course some will just accuse the media of a beat up. Can’t be a beat up if it’s all fact.

  • 4 weeks later...

It looks like Cuba is next in the firing line. 

Now deemed a threat to America.

Someone just make it stop.  

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.