Skip to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

DonsTalk

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Terminate Velicka's loan deal ?

Is this an option ?

  • Replies 74
  • Views 14.9k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Featured Replies

Probably,but I doubt that it'd result in the return of Foster/Cafu.

 

Velicka is quite possibly one of the worst piece's of business we've ever done.

 

I've retracted the Nigel Pepper part.

Velicka is quite possibly the worst piece of business we've ever done. Right up there with Nigel Pepper.

 

Nonsense. He's not costing us anything. 

I don't think he was alluding to monetary cost. But I'd hardly put it in the same bracket as Nigel Pepper! It was a shocking transfer, thats all.

I don't think it's ever been confirmed if we're paying anything for Velicka or not. Would certainly make no sense for the Huns to loan a player who is out of contract at the end of the season for free, they'd just release him.

 

If we are paying wages due to the financial constraints on our club it certainly has to be up there with Pepper, in my opinion. That's with the help of hindsight obviously.

Nonsense. He's not costing us anything.

 

Allegedly.

I don't think he was alluding to monetary cost. But I'd hardly put it in the same bracket as Nigel Pepper! It was a shocking transfer, thats all.

 

Whether it's monetary cost or not, it's still nowhere near the worst piece of business we've ever done.

If, from what has been said, he seems uninterested then ship him out. Last thing we need is someone dragging their heels even if it is just in training. Due to the amount of youngsters in the first team squad we need more role models, we already have enough piss artists.

We may not be paying him wages, but he costs us in time and effort in the physio room and on the training pitch. Time and effort that should be used on one of our players. Just send him home, it's not doing either of us any good having him here.

If, from what has been said, he seems uninterested then ship him out. Last thing we need is someone dragging their heels even if it is just in training. Due to the amount of youngsters in the first team squad we need more role models, we already have enough piss artists.

 

Correct.

We may not be paying him wages, but he costs us in time and effort in the physio room and on the training pitch. Time and effort that should be used on one of our players. Just send him home, it's not doing either of us any good having him here.

 

Aye, i'm not saying we shouldn't ship him out, just that to label that as the worst piece of business we've ever done is hyperbole. We've had far more catastrophic deals than this one. Have to keep in mind that we may actually end up getting some decent cash for Foster out of it.

Would certainly make no sense for the Huns to loan a player who is out of contract at the end of the season for free, they'd just release him.

 

Apart from they'd have had to pay him off and would have had no bargaining power in the loan deal for Foster.

Apart from they'd have had to pay him off and would have had no bargaining power in the loan deal for Foster.

Well it depends who you listen too. McGhee at the time said he initiated the move. Whether that's true or not who knows but I'd wager we'd have let Foster go on loan whethr we were getting Velicka or not.

 

I think they'd rather pay him off than have him sitting doing nothing due to there being no reserve league if we didn't want him.

Aye, i'm not saying we shouldn't ship him out, just that to label that as the worst piece of business we've ever done is hyperbole. We've had far more catastrophic deals than this one. Have to keep in mind that we may actually end up getting some decent cash for Foster out of it.

 

Agree. I wouldn't even put it in the top 10 shite transfers.

i think you'll find he is getting paid a wage by us and its more than £2k from what I have heard

i think you'll find he is getting paid a wage by us and its more than £2k from what I have heard

 

What you heard being more of a fact than what every other cunt heard?

 

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

What you heard being more of a fact than what every other cunt heard?

 

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm

 

yup.

 

he's getting a wage from us (fact) and it's more than £2k too (positive)

yup.

 

he's getting a wage from us (fact) and it's more than £2k too (positive)

 

I say you're wrong.

I say you're wrong.

 

He can't be. He used the word "Fact".

I say you're wrong.

 

wanna bet?

it-are-a-fact.jpg

wanna bet?

 

:lolabove:

 

What the fuck are you going to do? Post up wage packets and bank statements from both clubs?

 

I actually lolled there!

Would certainly make no sense for the Huns to loan a player who is out of contract at the end of the season for free, they'd just release him.

I disagree with you here bobo.

Maybe the huns felt that they could send us Velicka on loan he would get his fitness and sharpness back and they could offer him a new contract, probably on reduced terms due to his injury woes. This would have been a striker that along with Kendo "super goal machine" Miller would help to replace boyd and give them some experienced attacking backup on the bench.

I reckon he huns would have reasoned he had a far greater chance of first team action at us rather than them what with their 4 million signing. They may also have been worried about losing Kenny Miller this season as well as his contract is up. A win win situation for them. They would have had to pay his wages if they paid him off anyway. This way they get defensive back up and give Velicka a chance to prove his fitness.

I disagree with you here bobo.

Maybe the huns felt that they could send us Velicka on loan he would get his fitness and sharpness back and they could offer him a new contract, probably on reduced terms due to his injury woes. This would have been a striker that along with Kendo "super goal machine" Miller would help to replace boyd and give them some experienced attacking backup on the bench.

I reckon he huns would have reasoned he had a far greater chance of first team action at us rather than them what with their 4 million signing. They may also have been worried about losing Kenny Miller this season as well as his contract is up. A win win situation for them. They would have had to pay his wages if they paid him off anyway. This way they get defensive back up and give Velicka a chance to prove his fitness.

 

This.

This.

 

Indeed, makes sense. Not necessarily the truth but the most sensible version of events.

Don't know if we can release him but I'd love to see us send him back. We don't need him and he doesn't by all accounts want to be here.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Important Information

Terms of Use

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.