PittodrieGoesBerserk

That one's for kids over 6 foot.

I wonder if "Sorry son, we're not going to offer a contract because you are too small" is actually the club's official way of letting youth players down gently and what they actually mean is "you're shite".

http://soccer-stats.football365.com/dom/SCO/teams/Aberdeen.html

??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? ??? Now I'm completely lost.

I bet you £1000 we won't end up six points adrift after these two games. In fact, make it a round million pounds.

I'm sure it's a 100% verified fact. I wonder what "JC has two games to save his job" actually means though? I mean, what does it actually mean? Actually? Is a win and a loss enough to be sacked? Is a draw and a loss enough to be sacked? If we get beaten 1-0 in both games despite outplaying the opposition twice, is that enough to be sacked? Or if we win both games despite playing dreadfully, is that enough to be sacked? What about beating Falkirk 1-0 then losing 4-0 to Hearts? Is that enough? How about beating Hearts 10-0 but losing 10-0 to Falkirk? Is that a sackable offence? What a load of shite.

:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :dance: :beers: :beers: :beers: :ultras: :ultras:

Right. I've ticked the wrong box then.

No. The question is 'Do you still enjoy the football?' 'No' means that I do not still enjoy the football. The 'still' in the question implies that this also means that I have enjoyed the football at some point though,which renders 'Not as much as I used to' a bit redundant. I.e. they mean the same thing. Unless 'No' means 'I have never enjoyed the football', in which case 'the football' needs clarified. What football? Calderwood's? Aberdeen's? All football ever? And I voted 'Yes', because I still enjoy the football. But I don't enjoy it as much as I used to.

What's the difference between 'no' and 'not as much as I used to'?

Everyone's got one leg longer than the other. It just affects some people's spine, hips, muscles, tendons etc more than others.

I think Daily Mail readers have the worst views.

Ditto.

It'll probably be an improvement.

Of course, I wasn't thinking.

You've taken that too far. Interesting thought though...do you think anyone's boyhood hero is Ian Durrant?

Aye that's right: judge Foster on two games this season, one of which we won with a good defensive performance, rather than his professional career. I'm beginning to understand why most people here seem to think you're a prick.

The one thing Foster's got is pace and that should be enough to deal with Miller. If Miller gets in behind the defence, Foster may be one of the only defenders in the SPL who has the speed to get back and cover him. Miller's a headless chicken who for some reason manages to get away with it at international level.

Gay.

I'm sorry SuperTrade, but it was actually: A Nasty Dons Yob Clobbers Ageing Mediocre Entertainer Reciting Orange Nonsense

That's three words.

Uncanny isn't it?

Kano was murder.

We're not alone there though mate. That's the main symptom of post-millennium Scottish football. Not even the OF are immune from that - there are no more Larssons or McCoists for the gruesomes. With so much money in English fitba (from top to middle) and precious little up here, we're feeding off scraps. The only hope is for Sky to do an ITV Sport, or people getting bored of football, and there's no sign of either of those happening soon.