RicoS321

I thought Souttar was suspended for Tuesday? Or was that just something I'd dreamed. Obviously, Clarke would still take the opportunity to play Hanley on his wrong foot. Anyway, a great result, never in doubt. Nice one Belarus.

Been done to death, my thoughts on Hanley, but we simply can't afford to have him on his wrong foot without the out-ball of Dykes. A moderately competent manager will see to it that Robertson is forced to play two yards away from him by pressing him on the ball. We don't even have Gilmour for a quick pass into midfield either. Make a point of watching Hanley on the ball tonight and see how he either takes a touch to get it on his right first, or plays the ten yarder to an unnecessarily deep Robertson.

Jesus loved snow, which you'd know if you'd paid attention at school.

Too slow

County get humped again. Impressive. Raith get a lift after ditching Robson as they only lose 3-0. Marshall scores again for Arbroath.

Aye, it's a difficult one, but certainly our best chance of qualifying. A draw here would set us up perfectly for Tuesday. I think we have to take the same approach as the Denmark away game, with Dykes and Adams up front, and just remaining tight across the rest of the pitch. Biggest problem with the 4-4-2 is the absolute necessity of playing McTominay. That means he slots into the midfield two and inevitably gives away cheap possession and forgets to track his man. If there's a way to have Ferguson sitting in front of the defence, in a diamond, with Christie and McGinn either side and McTominay ahead, then that's probably the best option. Don't think I'd try and work Doak into this one. Save him for the Denmark game, and play to his strengths then.

Nah, unlikely. VPN to the UK and get it on BBC iPlayer. I believe that there isn't a way to watch the BBC legally in the state of Florida.

The idea of us having three centre backs is because we kept losing stupid goals with only two in there! I've mentioned before, if we played a 3-4-1-2, then you can have Armstrong in number 10, who'd be perfect there. We do the weird 3-4-3 thing, where either him or Aouchiche play wide, and reek the place out. Largely to accommodate Karlsson I expect. Works okay when we're trying to stay solid I guess, but blunt as fuck going forward for the reason you state - the midfield then don't get forward (centrally). The back three does allow Devlin and Knoester to go for a run without too much concern back the way, which I think is important with the way JT asks his defenders to play.

Piece of piss. Dons pick up yet another trophy in 2025.

I disagree. It's the equivalent of saying Billy Gilmour isn't good enough. You adjust the team to get the best out of players like Clarkson, because if you do then they'll create numerous chances. They're the difference between being a sideways, laboured, slow build up team, that hopes for a mistake from the opposition, and a team that makes the incisive pass and brings the attacking players into play when they have their best chance of scoring before the opponent gets back. The fact that we didn't sign anyone to compliment Clarkson, even as an option during games, is criminal. Even Robson knew how to get the best out of him. Clarkson taking the ball from defence and immediately getting the strikers involved, with Ramadani and Shinnie pressing high was a great setup. That, with the option switch and play two defensive midfielders and a number 10 like Armstrong would be a great way to build a squad (midfield). We really only needed one additional signing to do that. There isn't a chance on earth that Marshall is close to the level of Clarkson (that's not a criticism), and the Icelandic laddy looks to me to be a replacement for Nilsen in the squad, but I doubt he'll be getting much time this season. If Polvara is open to being a utility player, then he's worth his weight in gold. Palaversa can leave with many thanks for his only good game.

Me too. Now that Hedderman has left, and the lads at Brewdog are on board, I'd like to see us trial a back four during the upcoming Kilmarnock game.

I'm confused. Because of the beer?

I don't want to talk about VAR specifically, so I'm including here. Does anyone have an idea of the boundaries of "clear and obvious" in a general sense?

What are everyone's thoughts on the paintwork in the south stand? I think it needs re-done.

I think we should define whether we're sticking with a back five permanently or not, because the difference between a guy that can play left back, and a wing back is quite significant.

I'm not really sure what the purpose of having a test run of alcohol sales in one stand is? It seems like a good idea, but if we haven't got the ability to stretch to the other stands then it seems a little short sighted.

I don't mind a few of the brewdog beers, but it's clear that the guys - or at least one of them - running the company are dicks.

What are everyone's thoughts about the problem of left back? Obviously I don't want to start a new thread, or include in the threads assigned to other left backs, or the squad in general. I specifically mean just left back, but it's probably not worthy of its own thread, so I thought it would be best to mix it in amongst the thread for stuff, because it's such a good catch all. Of course, it doesn't relate to brewdog, or alcohol at the football in general, but if we have it interspersed with those discussions it will be really helpful and easy to follow.

Seems like we could have had an "alcohol at football" thread. Think I'm going to get onto the lads down at Reform to discuss the issue of forum immigrants.

I'm sensing a deepening split in the moderator camp. Exactly the sort of thing that happens when dangerously miscellaneous threads are introduced to a forum. 263 people were killed in 2022 due to forum related violence, of which almost all were down to the lazy categorisation of topics. Forum moderator was the third most dangerous job in the UK that year.

I'm not an authority on these things, but it doesn't seem any more ridiculous to have a brewdog partnership thread than an individual player thread. Although a sponsorship and marketing thread might be a good catch all in this instance. The issue with a miscellaneous folder, as anyone who works in an office knows, is that folk abuse it by throwing shite in that could easily come under another category, and it never gets tidied up. It becomes a dumping ground for irresponsible posters. It's a bit like VAR. Nobody can actually define what clear and obvious actually is, or the boundaries of clear and obvious, and so everything is up for scrutiny. If you can define the boundaries of "stuff", then you should start a new thread. If you can't then you shouldn't. I teach a Masters in forum philosophy if anyone's interested.

You've even gone with the American spelling. Nice touch.

Because they were invented in 1746 by Sir Barry Mince. Ironically, he died on Christmas day a year later, after choking on a bone in his beef mince pie. Back then, Christmas Eve was the time for drinking, and Barry had had a skinful. Hungover on Christmas morning, he sneaked down to the kitchen before everyone woke and stole a pie reserved for the servants. The beef mince pie was their treat, not being allowed to share in the eight bird roast of their masters. The staff found him dead when they arrived for work. The local press went with the headline "Barry Mince-meat pies dies!". Many believed he would have gone on to be Prime Minister, had he not been taken to soon at the age of 74. He was knighted posthumously for his services to Christmas culinary tradition.

A few trips to Leith and they want their money back? No real surprise.