Skip to content

Holy Mother of Jesus: AWPR Approved

Although I dare say we will be waiting another 10yrs for them to actually build the fucker:

 

Aberdeen bypass given green light

 

 

The controversial Aberdeen bypass has been approved by ministers.

The Scottish government has given the project the go-ahead after considering the findings of a local inquiry. Industry figures welcomed the decision on the £295m-£395m project, which is aimed at easing traffic and improving business in the north east.  But opponents have criticised the cost and the environmental impact of the 28-mile bypass. Campaign group Road Sense said it would take legal advice. 

 

The planned bypass is aimed at providing a fast link between towns to the north, west and south of Aberdeen.  Subject to all the approvals being met, work could get under way in 2011. Finance Secretary John Swinney said: "This has been a complex issue in which there has been a wide range of issues to consider. "There has also been significant public interest in the proposed route, with clear arguments on both sides.

 

"Having given careful consideration to the issues and arguments, I agree with the reporters' findings and reasoning, and with their recommendation to proceed with the bypass."  He said the bypass was one of the most important infrastructure projects in the north east, bringing a range of substantial benefits to the region. Mr Swinney said it would reduce congestion in the heart of the city as well as remove thousands of vehicles from the area's rural roads.

 

 

Aberdeen North SNP MSP Brian Adam said it was the "best possible early Christmas present for residents and businesses in the north east".  Aberdeen Central Labour MSP Lewis Macdonald welcomed the decision, but called for assurances about project funding, no delays, and stressed the need for better rail and bus services. 

 

And West Aberdeenshire and Kincardine Lib Dem MSP Mike Rumbles said it was a "vital transport project".  Bob Collier, chief executive at Aberdeen and Grampian Chamber of Commerce, said: "Democracy has now run its course and we would ask any protest groups to think very carefully before taking any action that might delay this investment which has the full support of the vast majority of local businesses and residents."

 

 

Councillor Kevin Stewart, chairman of regional transport partnership Nestrans, described it as a "defining moment" for the local infrastructure. And Scottish Council for Development and Industry (SCDI) north east manager Ian Armstrong said it would "boost economic recovery and confidence". 

 

However, Road Sense spokeswoman Sheona Warnock said the group was extremely disappointed at the decision and expected there would be grounds for a legal challenge, including a judicial review. She predicted that would cause significant delays to the project. Friends of the Earth has joined Road Sense in claiming the building of the new road could mean Scotland failing to meet its climate change targets.  Scottish Green MSP Patrick Harvie said: "This Scottish government either doesn't understand climate change or doesn't care about it." And Transform Scotland said the project would do nothing to address the key traffic congestion issue in Aberdeen. 

 

The Scottish government said the country could hold its head high at having the most ambitious climate change legislation in the world, and having the determination to implement the targets.  Campaigners also recently criticised the £51m cost of moving the International School of Aberdeen to make way for the road.  A long-running public inquiry was held in Aberdeen last year. The Scottish Government said the probe was necessary because of the public response. Story from BBC NEWS:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/scotland/north_east/8424142.stm

 

  • Replies 203
  • Views 88.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Featured Replies

December 21, 2009, 03:16:14 PM:

 

Aberdeen bypass given green light

 

August 11, 2011, 01:55:29 PM:

 

"We haven't got to the point of considering an appeal."

 

;D

 

These cunts are making a career out of this saga.

Ruling clears obstacles on route to bypass – by 2017

 

By Ryan Crighton

 

Published: 12/08/2011

 

Drivers could be on Aberdeen’s long-awaited bypass by 2017 after a judge cleared the way for the road to be built.

 

The legal challenge which has held up the city’s Western Peripheral Route was dismissed at the Court of Session yesterday.

 

The decision was met with relief by First Minister Alex Salmond and business leaders, who said the north-east’s congestion nightmare would soon be over.

 

:hammer:

STFU the fuck up and fucking build it, thank you please.

  • Author

So it comes down to the age-old question.  What will we see first the AWPR or the New Stadium?

Place your bets

BAAAHAHAHA!!  :lolabove:

6 years?

 

How exactly, it's got funding and it's been approved.

 

Bastards

I guess because a big road like that takes a while to build? Although I don't know enough about building roads to know how long it should take.

 

My guess is they're still scrutinising the route to see where else they can stick some round-abouts, traffic lights, 20 mph zones and zebra crossings to make the road as much of a PITA in the ass to negotiate as possible. See every other fucking road in Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire as reference.  :hammer:

 

I guess because a big road like that takes a while to build? Although I don't know enough about building roads to know how long it should take.

 

My guess is they're still scrutinising the route to see where else they can stick some round-abouts, traffic lights, 20 mph zones and zebra crossings to make the road as much of a PITA in the ass to negotiate as possible. See every other fucking road in Aberdeen and Aberdeenshire as reference.  :hammer:

 

It depends, but one thing for sure is that it'll take a fuck longer if they never start building the fucker.

 

If its not in the central belt then it doesnt need to be done properly. THiss NEEDS to be a proper  upgrade to a motorway or it just wont work.  If this is the case then Aberdeen as per usual when major ifrastructure projects are dished out get second best.  A petition needs to happen to get a REAL WPR which is both useful and safe. Edinburgh or Galsgow wouldnt tolerate second best.

 

They've done such a good job at castlecary that I no longer have an On ramp. Shambles with no concern for public convenience or safety. A few thousand extra cars through castlecary village twice a day must have them singing the praises of this fantastic construction work !!

  • 2 weeks later...

At this rate we'll have run out of oil before the damn thing's built!

I see the tax payer is funding the appeal and its not likely to be heard until next year.  What a shower of cunts.

 

Complaints can be sent here: http://www.road-sense.org/contact.html

 

"William Walton" doesn't sound like a local name to me.

 

 

6 years?

 

How exactly, it's got funding and it's been approved.

 

Bastards

 

You can make that 7 now:

 

RoadSense defends Aberdeen bypass challenge

Campaigners set to challenge AWPR

 

By David Ewen chief reporter

 

Published: 29/08/2011

 

THE chairman of Aberdeen bypass campaigners RoadSense has defended the group’s stance.

 

William Walton  :wanker: of RoadSense is set to challenge the planned Aberdeen bypass in the courts again, which means it might not be ready until nearer 2018.

 

William Walton said: “Our group is not necessarily opposed to a bypass in principle. We take the view that this particular route is going to be hugely expensive and is not a good use of public resources.”

 

Petition: http://www.gopetition.com/petitions/roadsense-stop-the-nonsense.html

  • Author
William Walton said: “Our group is not necessarily opposed to a bypass in principle. We take the view that this particular route is going to be hugely expensive and is not a good use of public resources.”

 

But repeatedly dragging the council through the court and delaying the project, thus inevitably increasing the overall cost is a good use of public resources?

Of course this has nothing to do with Nimbyism at all  ::)

 

Fucking eedjits

But repeatedly dragging the council through the court and delaying the project, thus inevitably increasing the overall cost is a good use of public resources?

Of course this has nothing to do with Nimbyism at all  ::)

 

Fucking eedjits

 

Send the author an email and tell them they're a cunt. I honestly don't think the pro campaign has been very vociferous, and probably has led to this muppets thinking they've got the necessary support.

6125  :thumbsup:

The boy William Walton seemingly lives in Westhill so he's not even going to be disrupted by the AWPR route.  ::)

  • Author

Wouldn't it be a shame is someone was to sign up this email to random websites enquiries@road-sense.org

See Link:

http://abdn.ac.uk/~wpg018/staff/personal_pages/staff.php?page=waltonw

 

wwalton.jpg

 

Looks like he is an professional objector:

 

Advisor of planning matters to Bridge of Don Action Group (opposing proposed housing scheme at East Woodcroft, Bridge of Don).

 

Advisor on planning matters to The Green Wedge action group (opposing new settlement proposals at Banchory Devenick and Blairs)

 

Advisor on planning / transport matters to Save Our Stonehaven (opposing) proposed major housing scheme at Stonehaven), 1996.

 

Advisor on planning / transport matters to Kingswells Infrastructure First Group (opposing proposed Aberdeen FC stadium on greenbelt site) 2002-2003.

 

Advisor on planning / transport matters to Aberdeen Greenbelt Alliance (opposing proposed new settlement at Countesswells, major housing allocations at Craigton Road / Friarsfield Rd, Cults and Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route) 2002 - present.

 

Advisor on planning matters to Pinewood Residents Group (opposing proposed major housing development at Ben Red Garden Centre, Aberdeen) 2005.

 

Advisor on planning / transport matters to Hutcheon Low Action Group (opposing proposed FirstBus bus depot and ‘global HQ’ on protected site).

 

Advisor on planning / environmental matters to Cowie Residents Action Group (opposing waste water treatment plant in historic village of at Cowie, Stonehaven), 2005.

 

Advisor on planning / transport matters to Tillydrone Community Council (opposing the Third Don Crossing, Tillydrone), 2006.

 

Chairman of Road-Sense 2006 – present, opposing the Aberdeen Western Peripheral Route.

 

Expert witness appearance at 15+ public inquiries (planning appeals and local plans) in northern Scotland including evidence against new settlements at Banchory Devenick, Blairs and Countesswells, and major housing proposals at Stonehaven and Pinewood. Addressed several large public meetings about planning matters including Cults Academy (500 people), Tillydrone Church Hall (100+ people) and International School of Aberdeen (1,100, 800 and 600 people). Instructed senior Counsel on planning matters.

 

Member of Journal of Property Research editorial board.

A complete cunt. Stoke cunt.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.