Sonoftherock Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 http://www.afc.premiumtv.co.uk/page/News/clubNewsDetail/0,,10284~1567240,00.html Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc_don Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 WTF. I thought it was supposed to only be the 1?!?!?! The bit about Jimmy should have learnt from his mistakes is oh so true. A one year deal would have been justified (just), but I think a two year deal is laughable, considering how shite he's been this season. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigAl Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 WTF. I thought it was supposed to only be the 1?!?!?! I thought this was last weeks news, and same as MD thought it was a one year extenson Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
octavion Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 I thought it was only fir one year too ? and was supprised they gave him that contract too Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TENEMENTFUNSTER Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 Fuck me, he may be costing buttons but on current form should be pushing them at McDonald's. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jute Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 Was unhappy he was getting a one year deal but a two year deal has got to be some sort of joke. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ally s Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 Was unhappy he was getting a one year deal but a two year deal has got to be some sort of joke. I can sense your blood pressure going through the roof Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizer Posted February 23, 2009 Share Posted February 23, 2009 What a fucking joke! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizer Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 But really, two years! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Padre™ Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Jimmy's obviously been told his options are limited for the next couple of years. Lets just accept the fact that Deek won't be doing the plumbing in your houses for another wee while and move on. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajja Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Cheap squad player using up very little resource at the club. Get over it guys. There are bigger things to get upset about surely ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mentorred Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Cheap squad player using up very little resource at the club. Get over it guys. There are bigger things to get upset about surely ? Like the arrival of Darren Young in the summer Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harcus Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Jimmy's obviously been told his options are limited for the next couple of years. Lets just accept the fact that Deek won't be doing the plumbing in your houses for another wee while and move on. FFuckS, do you know how many carpets are waiting to be laid in the North East?! Edit: Never mind, Ricky Foster is getting released. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajja Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 FFuckS, do you know how many carpets are waiting to be laid in the North East?! By the reactions to pictures of girls on this forum, as many as there are guys ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OneZero Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Cheap squad player using up very little resource at the club. Get over it guys. There are bigger things to get upset about surely ? Agree, was surprised when we took him back, then changed my mind as he had a couple of good performances but that has tailed off again. If he is not costing a lot, however, keeping him is probably not a bad option given he can play (albeit not brilliantly) in a more than one position. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 There are bigger things to get upset about surely ? Aye, like the lack of first team opportunities for young players for example. Derek Young doesn't play any positions that the great white hope Peter Pawlett can't play, I don't see the point in wasting any money regardless of how much it is, on Young when we've got the opportunity to give Pawlett more involvement to aid in his development as a player. If he's stuck behind Young (who will be 30 when his contract expires) then we risk of not seeing Pawlett's full potential. Although we do need squad players, they still need to be of a certain standard of which Young is not. If we're going to fill our squad with cheap squad players who aren't good enough to play on a regular basis if need be, we'd be as well just using our youth team as the squad players, they couldn't do any worse and we may get lucky with one or two who come into the first team and hit the ground running. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tlg1903 Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Aye, like the lack of first team opportunities for young players for example. Derek Young doesn't play any positions that the great white hope Peter Pawlett can't play, I don't see the point in wasting any money regardless of how much it is, on Young when we've got the opportunity to give Pawlett more involvement to aid in his development as a player. If he's stuck behind Young (who will be 30 when his contract expires) then we risk of not seeing Pawlett's full potential. Clearly the weakest part of calderwoods management style is youth development. bebo would have flourished ages ago if given more of an opportunity in a striking role as opposed to being lumped onto the wings Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajja Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Aye, like the lack of first team opportunities for young players for example. Derek Young doesn't play any positions that the great white hope Peter Pawlett can't play, I don't see the point in wasting any money regardless of how much it is, on Young when we've got the opportunity to give Pawlett more involvement to aid in his development as a player. If he's stuck behind Young (who will be 30 when his contract expires) then we risk of not seeing Pawlett's full potential. Although we do need squad players, they still need to be of a certain standard of which Young is not. If we're going to fill our squad with cheap squad players who aren't good enough to play on a regular basis if need be, we'd be as well just using our youth team as the squad players, they couldn't do any worse and we may get lucky with one or two who come into the first team and hit the ground running. All very true however I'm not entirely convinced that we have inside knowledge of the management teams decision making criteria where youth is concerned. While I agree that it would be good to see young players getting a chance there is almost no evidence to suggest that JC has made the wrong decisions about other youth players he has chosen to keep out of the first team set up. If Young is 'ahead of youth players' in the queue then its because he doesn't think they are ready for the first team. I'd be interested to hear what examples you cite to support the notion that these decisions are incorrect. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizer Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 All very true however I'm not entirely convinced that we have inside knowledge of the management teams decision making criteria where youth is concerned. While I agree that it would be good to see young players getting a chance there is almost no evidence to suggest that JC has made the wrong decisions about other youth players he has chosen to keep out of the first team set up. If Young is 'ahead of youth players' in the queue then its because he doesn't think they are ready for the first team. I'd be interested to hear what examples you cite to support the notion that these decisions are incorrect. The last Hamilton game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kowalski Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 The last Hamilton game Young wasn't even in the squad? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajja Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 JMG! Why should Calderwood take the risk and play youngsters. Name one player recently who has come through the AFC youth system who hasn't been given a hard time from the supporters straight away - without being given time to settle! Even Anderson & Diamond were written off after poor early seasons, as was Maguire who folk are now raving about after last week. A fickle bunch are some Aberdeen fans who slag the fuck into new young players borne from the AFC youth setup. Other young players that have been moved on were obviously not good enough. Half the problem is that many fans believe the hype while the younguns are still playing under-16s games (fuck knows who generates the hype - probably eager parents - the same ones that say their kids aren't being given a chance by JC). Well, either them or buffoons like Stoney. I reckon one more season and the youth crop will begin to yield fruit though... maybe two seasons. Bottom line is that we have to trust that JC is not bringing in young players because they are not ready or not good enough. I agree with you that there is always hype surrounding young players. As fans we all want to believe that our young players are going to provide the solution to our frustrations. Its so much easier to believe in the unknown than the known and we get so caught up in this notion that it seems like such a clear view. Why can't JC see it ? The answer is because he actually works with these guys and sees what they are capable of, how they approach their training, their game planning and their fellow players, how they deal with pressure and how they respond to criticism. We see none of this, we just see dreams of what might be. As I said earlier, lets hear the evidence from those who shout for it to suggest that our current young players should be given extended runs in the team ? Lets see the list of young players who have been stifled at Aberdeen only to escape and set the footballing world alight ? Fair enough we see bad games from the current first team but while we challenge for 3rd and a cup QF is this reason to tear up the script ? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jute Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 JMG! Why should Calderwood take the risk and play youngsters. Name one player recently who has come through the AFC youth system who hasn't been given a hard time from the supporters straight away - without being given time to settle! Even Anderson & Diamond were written off after poor early seasons, as was Maguire who folk are now raving about after last week. A fickle bunch are some Aberdeen fans who slag the fuck into new young players borne from the AFC youth setup. Other young players that have been moved on were obviously not good enough. Half the problem is that many fans believe the hype while the younguns are still playing under-16s games (fuck knows who generates the hype - probably eager parents - the same ones that say their kids aren't being given a chance by JC). Well, either them or buffoons like Stoney. I reckon one more season and the youth crop will begin to yield fruit though... maybe two seasons. Anderson was given stick at the start when he was playing as a right back. That stopped when he was moved to centre back. As for Diamond cannot remember him being given much stick. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajja Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Anderson was given stick at the start when he was playing as a right back. That stopped when he was moved to centre back. As for Diamond cannot remember him being given much stick. I used to give Anderson stick because of his bowl cut. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizer Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 Young wasn't even in the squad? I was meaning in that game he wasnt willing to give youngsters a game even though the players on the park were rank rotten. As I said at the time its one of two things, they are either not good enough or Calderwood is for some reason not giving them a game. My best mate who is a pars fan makes me think it is the second reason as he never liked Calderwood as he never gave youth the chance at East End Park. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
boboisared Posted February 24, 2009 Share Posted February 24, 2009 I was meaning in that game he wasnt willing to give youngsters a game even though the players on the park were rank rotten. As I said at the time its one of two things, they are either not good enough or Calderwood is for some reason not giving them a game. My best mate who is a pars fan makes me think it is the second reason as he never liked Calderwood as he never gave youth the chance at East End Park. Think it would have been extremely unfair to give any of those youngsters the burden of trying to carry the more experienced players Mizer. Theres a fine line between giving them experience and putting a heavy weight on their shoulders. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.