Skip to content

What Have You Been Watching on TV?

Oz and James Drink to Britain - must be great to get paid going on a booze up round the British Isles.  Very entertaining though.

 

 

Total Wipeout - has anyone seen this?  I'd love a crack at it!

  • Replies 2k
  • Views 445k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Most Popular Posts

Posted Images

Featured Replies

Mostly adverts!

 

Every 5 minutes or so it's more bloody adverts!

 

Cameron Diaz on Top Gear  ;D

 

Did she have to bring that prick with her?

 

That was great viewing last night! Getting the A-listers in lately.

 

Nice bit on Ayrton Senna as well. :thumbsup:

That was great viewing last night! Getting the A-listers in lately.

 

Nice bit on Ayrton Senna as well. :thumbsup:

 

Same thing happened the last time Wossy's prog was off the air.

 

Excellent viewing though, that Veyron was frightening!

 

 

  • Author

Sherlock Holmes last night was pretty decent.  Better than the Guy Richie film IMHO.

Top Gear was awesome  :thumbsup:

That programme just gets better and better

Lee Nelson's Well Good Show!

Sherlock Holmes last night was pretty decent.  Better than the Guy Richie film IMHO.

 

 

Aye I thoroughly enjoyed that when I watched it.  :thumbsup:

 

Top Gear was awesome  :thumbsup:

That programme just gets better and better

 

 

I just about split my sides on the first show when Clarkson was crashing the 3 wheeler everywhere. Class.  :thumbsup:

the Men Who Jump Off Buildings

 

Crazy bastards.

It's looking like there's gonna be a new arrival sometime soon in the BT adverts...

Watched that too bobby. The guys were absolute nutters. I was suprised the guy who fell had so few serious injuries, although i suppose he was still too injured to jump again. Still. Lucky to escape death!

 

Been chatting to my housemate about that, she got all excited because she thought there was a new one, but it was just bt announcing they've got sport lol.

Watched that too bobby. The guys were absolute nutters. I was suprised the guy who fell had so few serious injuries, although i suppose he was still too injured to jump again. Still. Lucky to escape death!

 

Been chatting to my housemate about that, she got all excited because she thought there was a new one, but it was just bt announcing they've got sport lol.

 

I would not have been using one of those wing suits the guy got towards the end... he used it really well and all that but it just looked rather flimsy!

  • 2 weeks later...

That was bizarre, but very interesting.

Anyone see this?

http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00tf1r4/Madness_in_the_Fast_Lane/

 

Madness in the Fast Lane!

 

Fuck me!!  :o

Seriously just watch the first five minutes!!!

 

 

Holy shit!  :o

 

Mentalists aside that's some of the finest TV I've seen in a while!

 

It never said how Ursula was when she was in hospital. I take it she wasn't acting like a complete fruitloop in there and it was just Sabina? Wonder which one of them was actually ill then seeing as they reckon one of them "passed it" to the other.

 

Very very interesting stuff.

  • Author

It doesn't seem right that she may be released next year, she must still be a threat to the public surely? 

That was absolutely crazy, good watch though! :thumbsup:

 

Don't see how they can release he, she's so unpredictable!

It doesn't seem right that she may be released next year, she must still be a threat to the public surely?

 

 

That's what I thought. There's no way that she's not a threat. The legal system seems setup to let dangerous people off. There's no doubt that she murdered that dude but she still just serves a couple of years in prison.  ???

 

That's what I thought. There's no way that she's not a threat. The legal system seems setup to let dangerous people off. There's no doubt that she murdered that dude but she still just serves a couple of years in prison.  ???

 

I'd hardly say it was set up to let dangerous people out.  As they said in the programme it was a unique situation.  She was clearly psychotic when she commited the murder, therefore not felt to be guilty of murder, only man slaughter.  If she was still psychotic she would be detained until such a time that she was no longer psychotic and a danger to the public.  This is what usually happens and can mean years of incarceration beyond her sentance. 

 

In this case she has some super rare condition where by the psychosis is fleeting and unpredictable.  By the sounds of it if she were never to see her sister again she would pose no threat to anybody, yet if she does then there will always be a risk she relapses.  Can't really blame the law too much for such an unusal presentation.

I'd hardly say it was set up to let dangerous people out.  As they said in the programme it was a unique situation.  She was clearly psychotic when she commited the murder, therefore not felt to be guilty of murder, only man slaughter.  If she was still psychotic she would be detained until such a time that she was no longer psychotic and a danger to the public.  This is what usually happens and can mean years of incarceration beyond her sentance. 

 

In this case she has some super rare condition where by the psychosis is fleeting and unpredictable.  By the sounds of it if she were never to see her sister again she would pose no threat to anybody, yet if she does then there will always be a risk she relapses.  Can't really blame the law too much for such an unusal presentation.

 

No but in general the law seems to be all about letting folk off. A lot of the time evidence has to be disregarded for one reason or another. I understand in this situation it's difficult. She's still in touch with her sister. God help the next poor fucker that these two run into!

Just caught up on BBC's Sherlock on iPlayer - rather good I thought and looking forward to more episodes.  :thumbsup:

Very strange program.

 

Mental illness is a bastard - surely they should have allowed her to be sent to a hospital for her time, can't the judge use his discretion?

But that was the whole problem, she wasn't psychotic at the time of her trail and didn't need treatment.

Yeah but surely the judge has the option to send her for further observation. Not sure when the trial was, but I think it said 3 or 4 months later, then how can they determine the issue wasn't long term? Surely the fact that at the time of the crime she was psychotic allows the judge the right to send her for longer term observation in a secure mental unit?

  • Author

Just caught up on BBC's Sherlock on iPlayer - rather good I thought and looking forward to more episodes.  :thumbsup:

 

I thought it was excellent.  Bound to get another series.  :thumbsup:

 

 

Madness in the Fast Lane!

 

Fuck me!!  :o

Seriously just watch the first five minutes!!!

 

Is that not the same stuff as we saw last year? sure i've seen that before.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

Account

Navigation

Search

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.