Kowalski Posted July 25, 2010 Author Report Posted July 25, 2010 Cameron Diaz on Top Gear Did she have to bring that prick with her? Quote
Madbadteacher Posted July 26, 2010 Report Posted July 26, 2010 Mostly adverts! Every 5 minutes or so it's more bloody adverts! Quote
manc_don Posted July 26, 2010 Report Posted July 26, 2010 Cameron Diaz on Top Gear Did she have to bring that prick with her? That was great viewing last night! Getting the A-listers in lately. Nice bit on Ayrton Senna as well. Quote
TENEMENTFUNSTER Posted July 26, 2010 Report Posted July 26, 2010 That was great viewing last night! Getting the A-listers in lately. Nice bit on Ayrton Senna as well. Same thing happened the last time Wossy's prog was off the air. Excellent viewing though, that Veyron was frightening! Quote
Kowalski Posted July 26, 2010 Author Report Posted July 26, 2010 Sherlock Holmes last night was pretty decent. Better than the Guy Richie film IMHO. Quote
Ptayles Posted July 26, 2010 Report Posted July 26, 2010 Top Gear was awesome That programme just gets better and better Quote
Tyrant Posted July 27, 2010 Report Posted July 27, 2010 Sherlock Holmes last night was pretty decent. Better than the Guy Richie film IMHO. Aye I thoroughly enjoyed that when I watched it. Top Gear was awesome That programme just gets better and better I just about split my sides on the first show when Clarkson was crashing the 3 wheeler everywhere. Class. Quote
BobbyBiscuit Posted July 28, 2010 Report Posted July 28, 2010 the Men Who Jump Off Buildings Crazy bastards. Quote
dave_min Posted July 28, 2010 Report Posted July 28, 2010 It's looking like there's gonna be a new arrival sometime soon in the BT adverts... Quote
manc_don Posted July 29, 2010 Report Posted July 29, 2010 Watched that too bobby. The guys were absolute nutters. I was suprised the guy who fell had so few serious injuries, although i suppose he was still too injured to jump again. Still. Lucky to escape death! Been chatting to my housemate about that, she got all excited because she thought there was a new one, but it was just bt announcing they've got sport lol. Quote
BobbyBiscuit Posted July 29, 2010 Report Posted July 29, 2010 Watched that too bobby. The guys were absolute nutters. I was suprised the guy who fell had so few serious injuries, although i suppose he was still too injured to jump again. Still. Lucky to escape death! Been chatting to my housemate about that, she got all excited because she thought there was a new one, but it was just bt announcing they've got sport lol. I would not have been using one of those wing suits the guy got towards the end... he used it really well and all that but it just looked rather flimsy! Quote
Kowalski Posted August 11, 2010 Author Report Posted August 11, 2010 Anyone see this? http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00tf1r4/Madness_in_the_Fast_Lane/ Madness in the Fast Lane! Fuck me!! Seriously just watch the first five minutes!!! Quote
Harcus Posted August 12, 2010 Report Posted August 12, 2010 That was bizarre, but very interesting. Quote
Tyrant Posted August 12, 2010 Report Posted August 12, 2010 Anyone see this? http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00tf1r4/Madness_in_the_Fast_Lane/ Madness in the Fast Lane! Fuck me!! Seriously just watch the first five minutes!!! Holy shit! Mentalists aside that's some of the finest TV I've seen in a while! It never said how Ursula was when she was in hospital. I take it she wasn't acting like a complete fruitloop in there and it was just Sabina? Wonder which one of them was actually ill then seeing as they reckon one of them "passed it" to the other. Very very interesting stuff. Quote
Kowalski Posted August 12, 2010 Author Report Posted August 12, 2010 It doesn't seem right that she may be released next year, she must still be a threat to the public surely? Quote
manc_don Posted August 12, 2010 Report Posted August 12, 2010 That was absolutely crazy, good watch though! Don't see how they can release he, she's so unpredictable! Quote
Tyrant Posted August 12, 2010 Report Posted August 12, 2010 It doesn't seem right that she may be released next year, she must still be a threat to the public surely? That's what I thought. There's no way that she's not a threat. The legal system seems setup to let dangerous people off. There's no doubt that she murdered that dude but she still just serves a couple of years in prison. Quote
glasgow sheep Posted August 12, 2010 Report Posted August 12, 2010 That's what I thought. There's no way that she's not a threat. The legal system seems setup to let dangerous people off. There's no doubt that she murdered that dude but she still just serves a couple of years in prison. I'd hardly say it was set up to let dangerous people out. As they said in the programme it was a unique situation. She was clearly psychotic when she commited the murder, therefore not felt to be guilty of murder, only man slaughter. If she was still psychotic she would be detained until such a time that she was no longer psychotic and a danger to the public. This is what usually happens and can mean years of incarceration beyond her sentance. In this case she has some super rare condition where by the psychosis is fleeting and unpredictable. By the sounds of it if she were never to see her sister again she would pose no threat to anybody, yet if she does then there will always be a risk she relapses. Can't really blame the law too much for such an unusal presentation. Quote
Tyrant Posted August 12, 2010 Report Posted August 12, 2010 I'd hardly say it was set up to let dangerous people out. As they said in the programme it was a unique situation. She was clearly psychotic when she commited the murder, therefore not felt to be guilty of murder, only man slaughter. If she was still psychotic she would be detained until such a time that she was no longer psychotic and a danger to the public. This is what usually happens and can mean years of incarceration beyond her sentance. In this case she has some super rare condition where by the psychosis is fleeting and unpredictable. By the sounds of it if she were never to see her sister again she would pose no threat to anybody, yet if she does then there will always be a risk she relapses. Can't really blame the law too much for such an unusal presentation. No but in general the law seems to be all about letting folk off. A lot of the time evidence has to be disregarded for one reason or another. I understand in this situation it's difficult. She's still in touch with her sister. God help the next poor fucker that these two run into! Quote
BrownyBrown Posted August 12, 2010 Report Posted August 12, 2010 Just caught up on BBC's Sherlock on iPlayer - rather good I thought and looking forward to more episodes. Quote
Dandy_Don Posted August 12, 2010 Report Posted August 12, 2010 Very strange program. Mental illness is a bastard - surely they should have allowed her to be sent to a hospital for her time, can't the judge use his discretion? Quote
glasgow sheep Posted August 12, 2010 Report Posted August 12, 2010 But that was the whole problem, she wasn't psychotic at the time of her trail and didn't need treatment. Quote
Dandy_Don Posted August 12, 2010 Report Posted August 12, 2010 Yeah but surely the judge has the option to send her for further observation. Not sure when the trial was, but I think it said 3 or 4 months later, then how can they determine the issue wasn't long term? Surely the fact that at the time of the crime she was psychotic allows the judge the right to send her for longer term observation in a secure mental unit? Quote
Kowalski Posted August 12, 2010 Author Report Posted August 12, 2010 Just caught up on BBC's Sherlock on iPlayer - rather good I thought and looking forward to more episodes. I thought it was excellent. Bound to get another series. Quote
️ Stand Free! ️
️ Stand Free! ️
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.