Stephen Robinson

[Ajja]

Having mulled this over and looking at some of the clues;

- we triggered a clause to be able to speak to him

- he mentioned he knows Lutz well and we know Burrows link

- Lutz assertion that we need someone who knows the Scottish game

Could it be that we have been doing this dance with SR for a few months as first option and the other candidates have been courted because we didn’t want to spend whatever the ‘clause’ demands?

Could explain why St Mirren have been absolute dugshit for months if his head was gone. Just a theory. 

[Redbull74]

2 hours ago, Ajja said:

Having mulled this over and looking at some of the clues;

- we triggered a clause to be able to speak to him

- he mentioned he knows Lutz well and we know Burrows link

- Lutz assertion that we need someone who knows the Scottish game

Could it be that we have been doing this dance with SR for a few months as first option and the other candidates have been courted because we didn’t want to spend whatever the ‘clause’ demands?

Could explain why St Mirren have been absolute dugshit for months if his head was gone. Just a theory. 

A fair few St Mirren fans have been moaning about that, saying it's obviously destabilised their dressing room since January as well as affecting Robinson. Saying we didn't want to pay the compensation. 

Unless they have inside knowledge it's pure speculation but possible. Could just as easily been the case that Robinson had no clue we were going to come in for him as we were publicly speaking to Lutz's preferred choices. 

[RicoS321]

The interesting thing about the Robinson appointment is that he's not the type of guy you get in as a stop gap to inspire a poorly performing team to see out a season. He takes time to get his preferred team on the park and implement his ethic. I don't see a huge uptick in results between now and the end of the season, and I think it'll be beyond January by the time he's had a chance to rejuvenate the squad. Hopefully he'll be given the time to do so. I think there's a slight window to make this team harder to beat and squeeze some points out of them, but not much else. I assumed that's what Leven would do, but his selections have been scattergun at best. I hope Robinson just goes full pragmatism and makes us a stuffy side, in the hope that guys like Cameron, Nisbet and perhaps Armstrong (Keskinen at a real push) can sneak us goals at the top end. There isn't a lot of room for error with this squad though, one bad selection and we lose a game.

Edited Saturday at 11:30 by RicoS321

[Radiored]

20 hours ago, dons8321 said:

Could change it so that every time the ref. stops the games for an "injury", whether or not the physios come on, the player goes off and doesn't return until next time the ball goes out of play.

How about if a player stays down for more than 30 seconds, it is deemed a serious injury, and said player is taken off the pitch ..... and subbed the next time the ball is out of play? .... Ah think that would fix it  

Oh .... and the substitution is counted as part of the 5 subs allocation.

Edited Saturday at 15:10 by Radiored

[TheDonbytheDee]

Article in the P&J where Robinson speaks about Cormack. Wasn't behind their paywall at time of posting. 

https://www.pressandjournal.co.uk/fp/sport/football/aberdeen-fc/6977487/aberdeen-stephen-robinson-dave-cormack/

 

[BigAl]

Anyone else attending tonight's online Q&A with Robinson 

[TheDonbytheDee]

9 minutes ago, BigAl said:

Anyone else attending tonight's online Q&A with Robinson 

Staying in to watch paint dry.

I'll get as much insight.

[Blow.Up.Sheep]

anywhere to find some info / detail on how the Q&A went 
anything said of any significance blah blah blah 

[BigAl]

1 hour ago, Blow.Up.Sheep said:

anywhere to find some info / detail on how the Q&A went 
anything said of any significance blah blah blah 

Here's my take on it good and bad:

The woman asking the questions was horrific

The sound quality was hit and miss, with one minute loud and clear and the next no audio at all

Robinson's opinion on the best player he ever played against was Steven Gerrard 

Kept referring to "the football club" as a top six club......needs to re-think that part

Now for the better parts in my opinion:

Honoured to be manager.

Praised the fan base and the facilities at AFC

Preferred formation 4-3-3 but only if he has the players to play it, otherwise happy to be flexible.

Not adverse to playing youngsters but only if good enough. If he has a 25 yr old and a 18 year old both playing same position and the 25 year old is the better player then he plays.

Keen to work on set pieces and may look to add someone for that to the coaching staff.

He has the final day on signings but obviously others do the leg work in identifying.

Anticipates a lot of movement in the squad over the summer.

Absolutely hates VAR with a passion and says it ruins the game for fans in particular.

I actually quite took to him and am potentially a bit more comfortable with him BUT talk is cheap and he knows he has to deliver

[RicoS321]

12 minutes ago, BigAl said:

Not adverse to playing youngsters but only if good enough. If he has a 25 yr old and a 18 year old both playing same position and the 25 year old is the better player then he plays.

This is the concerning bit, which is why the club's strategy needs to set the targets. A 25 year old might be a better player, but an 18-20 year old might have the potential to be significantly better than the 25 year old if given the freedom to develop. It's the easy option to go out and buy a new right sided defender, rather than get Jack Milne to be the player we should know he can be, for example. The 25 year old he speaks of, won't be a player that's already in the squad and has patiently waited their time to play first team football, it'll be a player that we've only just signed to replace the need to develop the young player already available in that role. 

[Blow.Up.Sheep]

1 hour ago, BigAl said:

Here's my take on it good and bad:

The woman asking the questions was horrific

The sound quality was hit and miss, with one minute loud and clear and the next no audio at all

Robinson's opinion on the best player he ever played against was Steven Gerrard 

Kept referring to "the football club" as a top six club......needs to re-think that part

Now for the better parts in my opinion:

Honoured to be manager.

Praised the fan base and the facilities at AFC

Preferred formation 4-3-3 but only if he has the players to play it, otherwise happy to be flexible.

Not adverse to playing youngsters but only if good enough. If he has a 25 yr old and a 18 year old both playing same position and the 25 year old is the better player then he plays.

Keen to work on set pieces and may look to add someone for that to the coaching staff.

He has the final day on signings but obviously others do the leg work in identifying.

Anticipates a lot of movement in the squad over the summer.

Absolutely hates VAR with a passion and says it ruins the game for fans in particular.

I actually quite took to him and am potentially a bit more comfortable with him BUT talk is cheap and he knows he has to deliver

Cheers min 

SF 

[swaddon]

Any news on whether he's a chipper or a chippy man, or if he's a rowie or buttery man?

[mondo_notion]

I'm kinda warming to the guy.  As someone else said, it feels very much like a long term plan more than short.  If that is the case I worry if he will get the time he needs.  I'm speaking more about the fans than the board.  It seems to only take one armchair fan on facebook to criticise a manager these days before a large group are calling for his head.

3 points would be lovely on Saturday night but even if that isn't achievable I feel he really needs a good performance from whatever team he decides to put out.

[Jupiter]

I'm still expecting him to be fired before Christmas.