Agreed!
Aye it's the fairest way but the feminists, blinded by the massive chip on their shoulders would be up in arms.
I was gutted for Wawrinka. I would loved to have seen him win. I just hope Berdych takes full advantage of how knackered Djok is likely to be.
I see what you mean. But personally I generally can't watch best of 3 sets women's matches and sure as hell wouldn't watch best of 5 matches but despite the women's game drawing just a fraction of the money into the game they get parity with the men's game in terms of prize money so whilst that's the case I think they should be made to put in the same amount of graft. Just as long as no one forces me to watch it.
Although I suspect the lack of quality will stop a rule like that ever being implemented. The people in charge of the game don't want to see more women's tennis either.
Also judging by number of sets in the women's game being won 6-0 or 6-1 it's clear to me that even if there is some quality in the women's game there's certainly no depth.
In fairness it was Mav who pointed out the aesthetic qualities of her legs.
I found myself watching Watson yesterday. Usually I have a zero tolerance policy on women's tennis being on my TV set but like Robson today she produced a gritty and admirable performance. It's too early to tell if I will make an effort to watch women's tennis on any sort of large scale.
http://www.hmfckickback.co.uk/index.php?/topic/122876-rangers-to-withdraw-from-scotland/page__st__500#entry3357928
A post that, as suggested, every Hun should be made to read.
My first thought was that I'd be surprised if he went there. Money talks though. And I guess they will no doubt be able to offer 3 times what Aberdeen can.