BigAl Posted 10 hours ago Author Report Posted 10 hours ago 30 minutes ago, RicoS321 said: I assumed he was including himself in that? I'm going to go against the grain here and say that I thought he played well in the last two games. His movement was very good on Sunday, making space for others, probably not noticeable on the telly. He's an intelligent player, who quickly gets to grips with the position he's asked to play. He's not a world beater, but slightly above average and can play in numerous positions. We need a player like that in the squad. It means that you don't have to overload the squad with shite. On the assumption that you're always going to have injuries, he's a reasonably dependable all rounder that can cover, meaning that you can offer him twenty games a season comfortably and you don't need two players in every position. It's a case of better the devil you know, and we've seen how poor the signings have been, we'll definitely sign worse. He probably was but it brought to mind a favourite saying of my late mother's "Let he without sin, cast the first stone" You may well be right about his movement on Sunday as I know I've been at games in person before and thought someone was ok during the game only to read those watching on tv panning them, 1 Quote
RicoS321 Posted 9 hours ago Report Posted 9 hours ago 1 hour ago, Jute said: Think he is too weak for our league. Easily brushed off the ball and rarely wins a tackle. Would probably be best for both parties if Polvara moved on. MLS would be best move for him as not as physical as our league. Not all aspects of a player's game require strength in the tackle though. Clarkson is weak in the tackle for example. He's fairly decent defensively despite being a poor tackler because his positional sense is decent. He's very two footed (probably the most two footed player in the squad), and is technically decent. He's a vast upgrade on utility players like Dom Ball for example, who was poor, but still a worthwhile squad player who covered numerous positions in the course of a season. He's already better than several of our squad in their preferred roles, so I wouldn't be confident we could go out and get better. None of this is to say he's good, just that he's above average. If we accept that his weakness is physical strength, then that's no different to accepting that Shinnie's weakness is pace, and Devlin's is technical ability. We make up for it by signing players who compliment, whilst working with Polvara on strength conditioning and not being a fanny. Quote
TheDonbytheDee Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 7 minutes ago, RicoS321 said: Not all aspects of a player's game require strength in the tackle though. Clarkson is weak in the tackle for example. He's fairly decent defensively despite being a poor tackler because his positional sense is decent. He's very two footed (probably the most two footed player in the squad), and is technically decent. He's a vast upgrade on utility players like Dom Ball for example, who was poor, but still a worthwhile squad player who covered numerous positions in the course of a season. He's already better than several of our squad in their preferred roles, so I wouldn't be confident we could go out and get better. None of this is to say he's good, just that he's above average. If we accept that his weakness is physical strength, then that's no different to accepting that Shinnie's weakness is pace, and Devlin's is technical ability. We make up for it by signing players who compliment, whilst working with Polvara on strength conditioning and not being a fanny. I agree with you on Polvara. I've read a fair amount of shyte about how bad he was on Sunday and I thought he did fine enough. I also think he is getting a bit more physical, but that just isn't his game. The loon is a good technical player, maybe just not suited best to our league. Thankfully he manned up last May, when he stepped up and put away his penalty. The best thing the club could have done for him when he signed, was to ship him to Arbroath, or some other Championship team to introduce him to the realities of Scottish fitba. For me our tactics are our biggest issue and most of our players are being sent on to the pitch to fail. None more so than our strikers. I actually feel sorry for Lazetic and Nisbet. 1 Quote
Blow.Up.Sheep Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 3 minutes ago, TheDonbytheDee said: I agree with you on Polvara. I've read a fair amount of shyte about how bad he was on Sunday and I thought he did fine enough. I also think he is getting a bit more physical, but that just isn't his game. The loon is a good technical player, maybe just not suited best to our league. Thankfully he manned up last May, when he stepped up and put away his penalty. The best thing the club could have done for him when he signed, was to ship him to Arbroath, or some other Championship team to introduce him to the realities of Scottish fitba. For me our tactics are our biggest issue and most of our players are being sent on to the pitch to fail. None more so than our strikers. I actually feel sorry for Lazetic and Nisbet. Tactics, mate, you can actually see tactics in that shambles of set up, can you share them with me please as I canna see fk all. I am with you on feeling sorry for Nisbet, we all know he can score he has proved that, not sure about Lazetic but for now the jury is maybe out. But fk me we need to start getting back to basics and feeding our strikers give them chances to take and law of averages alone says they will score now and again. I am 100% convinced, give Nisbet a regular run of games (something he has not had this season) and feed him with chances and he will score more than he misses. Fk sake Aberdeen it's not rocket science Quote
Mason89 Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago In order to get the ball to Nisbet, it’s vital that it starts with Mitov making a 3 yard sideways pass to a centre half on the 6 yard line. That way, he can give the ball to an under pressure full back who has to pass it back the way to the centre half. From here, the important part is to thread a pass straight up the middle to a midfielder who is either facing his own goal, or isn’t looking at all This is the way football MUST be played. Otherwise, what’s the point? The paying public need to be entertained 1 Quote
TheDonbytheDee Posted 8 hours ago Report Posted 8 hours ago 16 minutes ago, Blow.Up.Sheep said: Tactics, mate, you can actually see tactics in that shambles of set up, can you share them with me please as I canna see fk all. We have tactics, just shit ones. I'm never going to be able to bore the nuts off anyone about tactics, as that shit bores me to death. As stated in an earlier thread, I think the way we play is being is forced down on us from above. I expected Leven to stop the playing out from the back nonsense, but he seems to be setting up differently from when he took charge last time around. Lutz being beside him on the bench, is telling me that Leven is just carrying the can, but not calling the shots. Quote
Jute Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago BBC running article saying Welsh might return to Motherwell if Celtic don’t need him. ETA link https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/cvg5v4ekrqqo Quote
Jute Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago Alfie Stewart’s loan deal at Inverness extended. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.