Sharpie Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 I noticed today that, newly promoted to the English Premier league, Wolves have an average attendance of 24k. Wolverhampton has a similar population to that of Aberdeen. Perhaps the surrounding area is more densely populated but I doubt that it would be by that much. Aberdeen are in a better situation than Wolves when it comes to opportunity for competing for top honours. The football on offer in the English second tier is, arguably, of a similar standard to that of the SPL. I can't figure out why Wolves would have such a better supported football team than us by a considerable margin? Am I missing something fundamental? Is it down to dominance of the Old Firm? If so, why didn't we fill the ground every week when the club was at the peak of its' success in the 80's? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tafkat Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 The West Midlands itself has a higher population than Scotland - obviously more fitba clubs but given that i've been to pittodrie when 36k have been there i do wonder what reason is for so many giving up. The average when we were the team in the 80's was about 18k and for a city with a population of 210k - compared to the 240k in Wolverhampton, so there's is better. Maybe fitba aint that important up here anymore. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tafkat Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 The easy access to watching EPL, La Liga and Serie A where people can watch much better football in their own home. Computer games, other sports and high prices for poor quality football don't help though. There are numerous reasons for people not going to watch football and it's not just because people are pissed off with the manager. I think overkill of live matches on tv and cost of getting in are pretty high up in reasons why crowds dropped. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpie Posted April 19, 2009 Author Share Posted April 19, 2009 I think overkill of live matches on tv and cost of getting in are pretty high up in reasons why crowds dropped. But it's not affecting Wolves though. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nellie The Don Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 Perhaps the surrounding area is more densely populated but I doubt that it would be by that much. This part is key, I feel. Without checking up on figures, I would think that the area surrounding wolverhampton would far, far more densely populated than the typical catchment area for dons fans. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc_don Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 This part is key, I feel. Without checking up on figures, I would think that the area surrounding wolverhampton would far, far more densely populated than the typical catchment area for dons fans. But then again, you could argue that there are far more teams to choose from in the surrounding areas. I mean with what, a 30/40 mile radius, you have City, Villa, West Brom, Wolves, Mansfield I guess my point is, there are not even many professional teams around Aberdeen whereas the football fan in the Midlands has a number to choose from. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Padre™ Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 But then again, you could argue that there are far more teams to choose from in the surrounding areas. I mean with what, a 30/40 mile radius, you have City, Villa, West Brom, Wolves, Mansfield I guess my point is, there are not even many professional teams around Aberdeen whereas the football fan in the Midlands has a number to choose from. It doesn't help that Aberdeenshire has more huns than Glasgow. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nellie The Don Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 But then again, you could argue that there are far more teams to choose from in the surrounding areas. I mean with what, a 30/40 mile radius, you have City, Villa, West Brom, Wolves, Mansfield I guess my point is, there are not even many professional teams around Aberdeen whereas the football fan in the Midlands has a number to choose from. If you include the whole of the west midlands in Wolverhampton's catchment area, though, you would need to include most of Scotland in Aberdeen's for a comparable population. Thus the teams in a comparable population catchment area for us would include the old firm, the dundee teams, hearts and hibs, motherwell etc. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sharpie Posted April 19, 2009 Author Share Posted April 19, 2009 If you include the whole of the west midlands in Wolverhampton's catchment area, though, you would need to include most of Scotland in Aberdeen's for a comparable population. Thus the teams in a comparable population catchment area for us would include the old firm, the dundee teams, hearts and hibs, motherwell etc. If that's the case then that is probably it. I couldn't be arsed researching and assumed wrongly. Padre is probably right when it comes to the Old Firm factor as well. Thread closed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tlg1903 Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 I dont think our attendances are helped by the fact that there is a lot foreign invaders working in the oil industry that have moved to aberdeen. No danger most of them give a shit about aberdeen or even scottish football Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_widdows Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 I dont think our attendances are helped by the fact that there is a lot foreign invaders working in the oil industry that have moved to aberdeen. No danger most of them give a shit about aberdeen or even scottish football And Dundee, Inverness, Edinburgh, Stirling, Perth & Glasgow are all 100% scottish aint they Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Padre™ Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 When he said foreign invaders, I think he was talking about weegies I think he meant the blacks. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc_don Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 I think he meant the blacks. I thought it was the Jews! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nellie The Don Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 I thought it was the Jews! Even when it was the huns, I knew it was the immigants. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc_don Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 Even when it was the huns, I knew it was the immigants. Damn those pesky immigrants Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tom_widdows Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 I thought it was the Jews! I thought he meant the Mancs Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
manc_don Posted April 19, 2009 Share Posted April 19, 2009 I thought he meant the Mancs I know, I hate them too.....oh wait Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
️ Come on you Reds! ️
️ Come on you Reds! ️
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.