OrlandoDon Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago Shankland absolutely has to be replaced. I give the rest a few more mins, maybe Christie for doak? 1 Quote
Kowalski Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago We’re showing as 6th in the third placed table now so we’re on the brink. The SFA has the chance to bin Clark after the Euros!!! Quote
OrlandoDon Posted 4 hours ago Report Posted 4 hours ago We just don’t create much at all, another game and the opponent doesn’t need a keeper. Quote
Jute Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago McTominay’s header in 48th minute was our first attempt on target since last 10 minutes of Haiti game. Quote
OrlandoDon Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Shankland and mcginn off for Christie and a forward. We’re doing nothing at present. Quote
Jute Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Clarke will have us playing for 2-0 defeat as analytics still show 68% chance of going through. Quote
OrlandoDon Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago We’re shite. Why advance if this is the best we can do…? Quote
OrlandoDon Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Get doak mcginn and shankland off, not giving us much at all. 1 Quote
southshoredon Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago (edited) 7 minutes ago, OrlandoDon said: We’re shite. Why advance if this is the best we can do…? Exactly didn’t qualify for 28 years yet what’s changed they certainly don’t concentrate on technical ability in players. Edited 3 hours ago by southshoredon Quote
Kowalski Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago 4 minutes ago, OrlandoDon said: Why aren’t we subbing???? Fuck knows. Shankland and McGinn need replaced. Quote
OrlandoDon Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago We’re gassed and have no pace other than tierney. Let’s not sub. Quote
OrlandoDon Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago I assume Clarke has a holiday booked and advancing ruins his plans? Quote
OrlandoDon Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago This is borderline farcical. wtf. I suppose Paterson is injured but why leave shankland and mcginn? Quote
Jute Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Another piss poor tournament performance under Clarke. Getting a bit annoying now. At least we didn’t offer him a 3 year extension…… Quote
Jute Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Now he makes changes up front. Words fail me. 1 Quote
OrlandoDon Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Three games and only the second half v Morocco is acceptable. Quote
Radiored Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago As Ah commented followin' the Haiti game ... 'shades o' 74' ..... That was the game we needed tae score mair than 1 goal. Brazil ranked 6, Morocco ranked 7 .... Haiti ranked 83? ... Scots ranked 42. We were always gonna struggle v the top 2, so it was vital we 'built a cushion' v Haiti. In 74, we beat Zaire 2-0 .... and resorted tae time wastin' the last chunk o' the game ... somehow thinkin' we'd done enough. Do we ever learn? Quote
OrlandoDon Posted 3 hours ago Report Posted 3 hours ago Pass marks for Ferguson, that lad stepped up and really tried. Good world cup for him. The rest were shit. Doak shit himself and was a complete non factor, mcginn rarely involved, and mctom mediocre at best. Shankland hardly touched the ball but long ball to one up top says a lot. 1 Quote
Radiored Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Aye, we might hae been better goin wi' the Craig Levein 6-4-0 formation Quote
manc_don Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago Classic Clarke performance this world cup. Absolutely shat the bed. Useless arsehole. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.