Summer 2026 Transfer Window

[CurlsLikeTattie]

2 hours ago, RicoS321 said:

I don't understand the point of being an Aberdeen fan (or any team), if you loan back a player who joined your most hated rival (from them directly, obviously). He can get fucked.

1 hour ago, Slim said:

I can live with signing him. Loaning is out of the question.

Dear old Dons Daft would be going apoplectic at this use of various tenses of the verb (or gerund) 'loan' being applied to the receiver, rather than correctly using the verb 'borrow'.

That said, he was rather prone to losing his shit when it was also being applied as a noun - in which case loan was (and is) a perfectly acceptable term when speaking about givers and receviers.

Ah DD, how worked up you got over nothing 

[CurlsLikeTattie]

14 hours ago, Mason89 said:

If we bought him, he publicly apologised, took out a two page spread in the P&J outlining all the different ways Huns are pricks, then did a penitent walk of shame from Union St to Pittodrie, I’d consider it 

Other than that, the Rat can go take a right good fuck to himself 

I would go wit this approach - with a cluse in his contract stating "if he hasn't scored 15 by Christmas, including a hattrick against the huns, we reserve the right to dismiss him"

[BigAl]

Jude Arthurs anyone ?

Captain of Bromley on a free transfer.

Another midfielder apparently 

[TheDonbytheDee]

14 minutes ago, BigAl said:

Jude Arthurs anyone ?

Captain of Bromley on a free transfer.

Another midfielder apparently 

Na...

Edited 6 hours ago by TheDonbytheDee

[Blow.Up.Sheep]

33 minutes ago, BigAl said:

Jude Arthurs anyone ?

Captain of Bromley on a free transfer.

Another midfielder apparently 

It's a no thank you from me 

[DonUnder]

4 hours ago, Don Julio said:

The second time rarely works out as well as the first. But with a suitable re-education process, perhaps a tattoo of Willie Miller and a promise to celebrate every goal against them by walking slowly towards them arms horizontal in front with hands bent downwards at the wrists and then genuflecting on his knees in front of them, I’d give it a go. 
 

Heresy I know. 
 

Oh and a 30 minute RedTV interview where he confesses his crimes and swears on his mother’s life his agent made him do it.

 

And maybe 10% of all future earnings going to a fund used to eradicate Hun supporting in the NE via a school based “education “ programme.

 

Slight upgrade but still a no from me. Given how poorly he did for them if he is best played on the last man in a team under pressure do we want him if we think we'll improve?

 

 

[Slim]

Bromley fans don't seem to be particularly bothered:

[tlg1903]

9 hours ago, Panda said:

I'd have Miovski back in a heartbeat. 

We're signing players who could be decent for us - Ronan, Briedl and the Killie lads. We've a few young players with potential like Frame, Lobban and Keskinen.

However, you need a Miovski or a Claudio Braga to elevate you to a different level. 

Would it be any different to Hayes coming back from Celtic, or Archie Knox winning titles at Rangers? Or how we feel about Snelders or Neale Cooper?

 

We don't hate Celtic like we do the Huns and no-one could blame Hayes for wanting to play in the CL for his boyhood club.  He had given us phenomenal service and he wasn't sleekit about it either.    Re Knox it's a bit different with coaches.  Snelders I never blamed at all because he was frozen out by Aitken who seemed to think Watt was better (fucking clown).  What a shock that Walter Smith had a better eye for a goalie than Aitken.  Cooper I don't know, I wasn't really a football fan at the time so don't know how it was received.  I would also add Aluko to this list.  I never gave him a hard time about going there as he had been OOC for a good few months and a man has to eat.  

Miovski is different because he bawled his eyes out, kissed the badge and then took to Instagram to say "moving forward I'll be the clubs biggest fan" which no-one forced him to do. Then he signs for them in less than a year.  It's certainly the biggest slap in the face I've ever had from a player in my years as a fan.  

All that said, and as I mentioned a month or so ago here, prolific goalscorers are the easiest players to forgive and if he was to come back I know I'm fickle enough to forgive (though never forget) all sins pretty quickly if he's rattling them in.  

[The.Moog]

17 hours ago, Mason89 said:

If we bought him, he publicly apologised, took out a two page spread in the P&J outlining all the different ways Huns are pricks, then did a penitent walk of shame from Union St to Pittodrie, I’d consider it 

Other than that, the Rat can go take a right good fuck to himself 

This, plus he needs to make a statement that he’s also coming back cause Stewart Milne has gone and he wouldn’t have been able to return to the club if a guy who did so much damage to the great name of AFC was still here - followed by a detailed list of all his multitude of failures and fuck ups (I’ll happily help with that) just to remind the hard of thinking in our support who seem to think he was some kind of saviour exactly what he was.

Yep, I’m still going on about that one too.

Oh, and we need 15 goals by Xmas or he’s fired out a cannon from the roof of the RDS.

Then, its a maybe…

 

Edited 5 hours ago by The.Moog

[RicoS321]

Signing Huns is fine, sort of. Getting Huns on a borrow agreement (I think that's the correct term) is fucking unacceptable. It was unacceptable with Cameron, it's fifty times more unacceptable to borrow miovski. For obvious reasons. They're not writing off a huge fee only for Miovski to join the Dons. Borrow would be the only option, and it's totally unacceptable. 

[tlg1903]

8 minutes ago, RicoS321 said:

Signing Huns is fine, sort of. Getting Huns on a borrow agreement (I think that's the correct term) is fucking unacceptable. It was unacceptable with Cameron, it's fifty times more unacceptable to borrow miovski. For obvious reasons. They're not writing off a huge fee only for Miovski to join the Dons. Borrow would be the only option, and it's totally unacceptable. 

Aye, having him on loan from them and potentially building him up to be a more attractive prospect so they get more money for him/keep him and play him is too sickening to contemplate.  Especially when he wouldn't be able to play against the team we would most want him to play against.   If Ferguson has a good world cup though we may see some movement on him and that could potentially provide enough cash to actually buy him. 

[tlg1903]

3 hours ago, BigAl said:

Jude Arthurs anyone ?

Captain of Bromley on a free transfer.

Another midfielder apparently 

Another captain. Robinson is defo trying to up the leaders in the squad.  Did a wee bit of digging on him and it would seem he's 5"7 purely def mid.  No assists at all last season in 43 appearances and 1 goal.  Reading between the lines he's a wee terrier type which we don't really have 2bf. 

[RicoS321]

Actually, I'm okay with the loan on one condition. If Cormack has information that Cormack park is built atop a disused mineshaft, accessible via trapdoor right at the front door. Upon signing, he's photographed outside, with a big cheeser underneath his Hun moustache, and invited back into the building. Cormack has switched the trap door for a bottomless rug, which Miovski steps on, falling 76 metres. He survives the fall, but after three days of screaming, he whispers a final "I'm sorry", before passing on to the place one floor below hell, reserved for all other Huns. The Dons report him missing after a week, and with nobody able to trace him, they are given a full refund of his wages to date and compensation of £100,000 from the Huns for their player's breaking of contract. Fourteen years later, the great grandson of Neil Simpson is taking a walk round the proposed site of a new underground training pitch, when he stands on Miovski's corpse, snapping his festering shin in two. 

Edited 3 hours ago by RicoS321

[Brochred]

3 hours ago, CurlsLikeTattie said:

Dear old Dons Daft would be going apoplectic at this use of various tenses of the verb (or gerund) 'loan' being applied to the receiver, rather than correctly using the verb 'borrow'.

That said, he was rather prone to losing his shit when it was also being applied as a noun - in which case loan was (and is) a perfectly acceptable term when speaking about givers and receviers.

Ah DD, how worked up you got over nothing 

I remember having a chat about Foster's loan to the huns with the much missed Donsdaft and he also used the term "shottie"

[CurlsLikeTattie]

47 minutes ago, RicoS321 said:

Signing Huns is fine, sort of. Getting Huns on a borrow agreement (I think that's the correct term) is fucking unacceptable. It was unacceptable with Cameron, it's fifty times more unacceptable to borrow miovski. For obvious reasons. They're not writing off a huge fee only for Miovski to join the Dons. Borrow would be the only option, and it's totally unacceptable. 

Haha - to quote Michael Lee Aday, "2 out of 3 ain't bad"