Garlogie_Granite

I think it's more failure to create enough clear cut chances. We need a "can opener" in midfield.

I apologise to the loon in the other thread whom I called mental. (Tho surely this is fat postie guesswork, not a genuine possibility?)

I thought 'mental' was an overreaction. Still can't see what that has to do with ego.

OK then, what qualities do you see in Clangers that would justify this mentalness?

 

 

oh boy 

Carmichael has to go surely?

 

He seems to think a simple apology and not taking his "severance pay" from the Scottish office are sufficient, indicating in his mind his crime is but a mere smidgen.

 

Everything, everything that is wrong with Westminster epitomised in this toad.

Leighton was an awesome goalkeeper, one of the best Scotland has ever produced.  Good luck to him in the future but it was probably for the best given that the goalkeeping position has long been an issue.

Yup a long succession of keeprs through the doors, none of whom have improved, it was time Jim..

 

Derek - "I would like to thank Jim for his contribution as a member of my team since I arrived at the Club". - the lack of any warmth or mention of his coaching ability tells all you need to know from this statement. 

Clangers as player-coach?

are you mental? A guy with little ability to coach others?

 

 

Of course this is just indicative as PR ballot papers (as far as I am aware) are massive as they need to include every single party in the election

That's a great point, so highly likely under Nicola's current UK wide wave of popularity, that the SNP would have had significantly more MPs than the 56 we've actually got, and that many of the UKIP protest votes would very well have gone to the SNP.

Milliband, Clegg and Farage all resigned.

 

Jim Murphy staying on.

Does creepy have no shame?

 

 

There's also a rise in UKIP voters - 3.5 million I think (twice as much as SNP?)!

Erm no, about a fifth of the SNP. The SNP stood in 8% of seats, were there any seats that UKIP didnt stand in?

 

hud

 

 

 

 

'at

and?

Nothing else, just an apology. You made a mistake, that's all.

What exactly do you want an apology for?

If you are upset that I took it upon myself to pick and prod and 'atempt' to engage in debate with you regarding your political beliefs then i'm sorry you cant live in a world where everyone follows your point of view. if they did it could either be classed as boring or maybe a dictatorship

 

Its also no secret that I am anti-SNP but i'm pleased you have cottoned on and if you think you can somehow make me more anti SNP I welcome your input. I also welcome your input if you wish to try and bring me to your way of thinking so that come May 2017 I might have some more guidance in my decision

 

Some might call me a bleeding heart lefty but on occasion ive been refered to as a nazi communist. That last one intrigues me still but its always nice to have a bit of a debate and it is intriguing seeing how people react when they can easily label you with one of the current political parties.

 

The exit poll does intrigue me as we could see the first minority government for 41 years. The tories will need to think carefully how they tread as a majority opposition can call for another general election within the year if they don't like how things are going.

Maybe the majority opposition could call for the FPTP system to be scrapped and completely overhaul the system?

Maybe the SNP would use the situation to their advantage by keeping the tory minority in power in exchange for more powers for scotland or perhaps even that magical 2nd referendum?

who knows it could for once be interesting.

 

Who knows

an apology for repeating the words of a lying cunt you lying cunt

Kezia would be worried that if there was over than 70% then people who had only ever voted in indyref were voting? Can she be any more mental? #votekeziagetspanners

Jackie Bird, wearing a dress that already looks splattered with white blotches, saves me the trouble 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/11589591/Scottish-Tory-leader-Ruth-Davidson-alleges-voter-intimidation.html

 

Lets see where this one takes us

Seriously? posted at half nine when the story was already totally and utterly rubbished by 4pm? Could you be any more anti-SNP?

 

I'm thinking "where this one takes us" is an apology from you?

I presume you know who Eddie Izzard is?

He doesn't always by any means dress as a wifie.

 

Why did they do it in Glasgow? Hmmm, the SNP make great play of equality in all aspects of their policies, so what better way to show them up as "hypocrites" than to have a cross-dresser getting abused in the middle of Glasgow.

 

Oh fuck, that didna work, fit noo? 

 

 

'There are no dickheads, thugs, racists, bigots etc in;

my country/my football teams fans/ my political party/ my home town/ my church and so on. We are all angels

Nobody is saying that.

 

however, 1. The point is creepy has form for setting this sort of thing up, & 2. The activists got a "tip-off" about where creepy would be appearing, as did the press who had already written their stories.

 

Regardless, lets look at the actual story here - creepy goes about shouting in public, three guys shout back, which has happened many times before, but somehow this time it's a "violent mob". And you don't think there was a plan here?

 

Put another way, you don't think Izzard dressing up as a wifie and then going walkies in Glasgow wasn't done deliberately as they thought they'd get some sort of homo-phobic abuse that they could peddle? When that failed to transpire they had to run with "violent", even though there was no suggestion of that whatsoever?

Folk trying to suggest the Jim Murphy thing was a set up is pretty laughable. The mans a cretin but going down the "Deflect Deflect Deflect" route does nobody any favours.

Come on now K, after all we saw at IndyRef, and having had a couple of days to digest this, you don't think this was Murphy's intent all along?

Yas min, that's fit politics is all about - being a deceptive cunt. About time there was some proper scandal, the whole thing has been a complete borefest. Any proof?

Well, within minutes, local journals such as the Basingstoke gazette, a publication I'd be pretty sure reports daily on the goings on in Glasgow, had an item up online on the "violence" in Glasgow.

 

Elsewhere, the twitter account of Cliff Morgan (The Kilted kelpie), one of Blair McDougall's henchmen, posted "I was in the crowd today in Glasgow, it was a warzone".  Sadly for him, he forgot to turn off his location - Bulgaria 

 

 

Hypothetical question

 

Like the unending boring pish we've seen in the TV debates where the "winners" of indyref want to bring up a non-existent call for indyref2, your point is not relevant to the debate.

 

By all means start a new topic on hypotheticals, b ut lets get back on topic oinstead of talking utter pish.

 

Thanks G_G

 

 

My point is if you are an SNP voter who is expecting a Labour/ SNP Coalition and will turn nasty if a Conservative/ SNP appears on May 10th they why bother voting for the Nats in the first place?

You either want a stronger Scots Nats voice at Westminster or you don't.

But your point is bollocks. There will NEVER be any sort of SNP/Tory alliance.

 

And n o, I don't - despite being a lifelong SNP voter - want a stronger SNP voice at Westminster, I want a stronger SCOTTISH voice, and that means not dealing with a party who have proved, especially in the last month, that Scotland means fuck all to them.

County supporting mate asked me about this yesterday. Should we be giving the tims  one on Sunday? The thought makes me sick to my back teeth but it can be argued that it would show a touch of class

It's sickening, but I think we should too, and not stop to their level.

 

I would however expect a round of applause for our players as they line up, then a massive fucking boo as the dirty smelly minks come out, and then a round of applause for our players again as their 'guard' breaks up.

If it turned out to be true it would say a great deal about the SNPs current increased support ie they would rather sacrifice a shot at actually having their party influencing the UK parliament just because of their potential Bed Fellows.

 

Are we destined to see another party in Yellow go tits up over the next 5 years?

And why did that first party go tits up again?  Which is exactly (other than you know - there are no points of agreement) why the SNP won't deal with a Tory party that Scotland has made clear for over 20 years they want no part of.