Author Topic: Stone Roses Debate  (Read 7023 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline SeeBass

  • Star Striker
  • ****
  • Posts: 1007
  • Rating: -135
Stone Roses Debate
« on: November 28, 2017, 05:20:57 AM »
I can't decide which of these two songs is thee greatest bit of music that will ever be recorded.  Their Live performance of second choice at Blackpool in 1989 still said only display anybody should need view.

One does think Fool's Gold will always be my favourite but do believe I Am The Resurrection by far the better composition.

Don't know how we got Ian, John, Mani and Reni into our book acknowledgement either!!!!

Offline tom_widdows

  • Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 4838
  • Rating: 40
  • Miserable Cúnt & Architectural Killjoy
Re: Stone Roses Debate
« Reply #1 on: November 28, 2017, 08:58:16 AM »
There should be a third 'Brown' option for this to be an official Donstalk Poll
I'm a man, and as a man I crave disappointment.

That's why I support Aberdeen Football Club & Scotland.

Offline baggy89

  • Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 3137
  • Rating: 42
  • God forgives, I don't.
Re: Stone Roses Debate
« Reply #2 on: November 29, 2017, 10:59:15 PM »
Empress Ballroom while an iconic gig had/has shite sound, so neither.
The Etihad in 2016 was the tightest they’ve ever been. I reckon. All were on top form and acoustics lent themselves to the occasion.

Offline Nips_and_Tatties

  • Star Striker
  • ****
  • Posts: 1031
  • Rating: 3
Re: Stone Roses Debate
« Reply #3 on: November 30, 2017, 07:23:17 AM »
Ok just my opinion.

The first stone roses album was excellent (as is I am the resurrection and fools gold).

It was great timing , mixing funky guitar riffs with rock and a cool 60s electronics experimental vibe.

The tunes were really catchy and the youth embraced it in the club scene.

However, after that, I believe they were over rated average musicians.

It's extremely trendy for some reason to love the stone roses when really they were a one album pony IMO.

Many of those 90s bands could be similarly described. Churning out some great tunes.

The SRs deserve their accolades but really for just THAT album.

there's far better musicians around who have done way more for the world of music but they're not as cool I guess.

Each to our own.carry n.


Offline Kowalski

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 14715
  • Rating: -12
Re: Stone Roses Debate
« Reply #4 on: December 02, 2017, 07:33:46 PM »
IMHO an overrated band with some great tunes.
Excellent musicians, dreadful singer.

Offline Sololex

  • Banned
  • Under 16's
  • *
  • Posts: 1
  • Rating: 0
Re: Stone Roses Debate
« Reply #5 on: January 07, 2020, 09:44:57 AM »
It's good

Offline Tyrant

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 9675
  • Rating: 119
Re: Stone Roses Debate
« Reply #6 on: January 07, 2020, 12:45:30 PM »
Is it, aye?