Shamelessly nicked from Aberdeen-Mad, but I thought this would go down well on here.
Had a debate recently and couldn't decide if Russell Anderson was a better player than Brian Irvine.
Both would easily walk into our team today, and though Irvine was always classed as a bit of a donkey, he still got 2 cup medals (inc the winning penalty in our last Scottish Cup win), over 300 appearances, 9 Scotland caps and about 30-odd league goals.
Anderson on the other hand fell short of the 300 mark, won nothing and picked up 11 caps, scoring 18 goals as well as being Dons captain for several seasons.
It's difficult to balance modern athleticism of the current players against the obviously higher standard of Scottish players in Dobbin's time, but in this sort of argument, I always think it should be a given that the older player would up his fitness if playing now.
We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.
Shamelessly nicked from Aberdeen-Mad, but I thought this would go down well on here.
Thoughts?