RicoS321 Posted Monday at 07:03 Report Posted Monday at 07:03 (edited) Egypt give NZ a pumping, 3-1. Elijah Just not good enough. Edited Monday at 07:04 by RicoS321 Quote
RicoS321 Posted Monday at 07:08 Report Posted Monday at 07:08 Both groups last night finish favourably for Scotland. We just need the group leaders, Egypt and Spain to win their games (Iran and Uruguay) and we're automatically ahead of the third place team regardless of our result on Wednesday. Quote
swaddon Posted Monday at 07:36 Author Report Posted Monday at 07:36 Needing other teams to get results rarely works out. Although it did for Mike Bassett when he managed England, so there is hope. Quote
RicoS321 Posted Monday at 08:15 Report Posted Monday at 08:15 27 minutes ago, swaddon said: Needing other teams to get results rarely works out. Although it did for Mike Bassett when he managed England, so there is hope. It's slightly different this time round, as twelve teams need other teams to get results and so it will be working out for 8 out of 12 sides. That has been known since the start, so short of beating either Morocco or Brazil, we'd have always been relying on other results. Clarke obviously feels Scotland's best chance comes from keeping it tight against Morocco and Brazil, trying to sneak a one goal win, with a draw and even a one goal defeat in both games giving more than 50-50 chance of going through. That's a fairly decent bet, if he can pull it off. The Haiti game was really where his conservative approach was at its most obvious. Keeping it tight after going a goal up to make sure we had something to play for, at the expense of a better goal difference, could be his undoing. Although, realistically, we'd have needed a 3 goal deficit in that game to have made a real difference, as that would have put us ahead of teams on three draws (assuming we only lost by one in the following two). I'm not sure we were capable of that. Quote
manc_don Posted Monday at 09:23 Report Posted Monday at 09:23 2 hours ago, RicoS321 said: Egypt give NZ a pumping, 3-1. Elijah Just not good enough. Was a good game and NZ were more than in it in the first half. Second half Egypt got away with quite a few favourable moments but got into the groove after equalising. Meeting me in Florence at a steak restaurant really was the turning point in salah’s career. Hasn’t looked back since. Hes welcome, 1 Quote
swaddon Posted Monday at 17:40 Author Report Posted Monday at 17:40 Messi misses a penalty, but he's just scored to become the all time top scorer in the World Cup. Quote
RicoS321 Posted Monday at 18:03 Report Posted Monday at 18:03 21 minutes ago, swaddon said: but he's just scored to become the all time top scorer in the World Cup Would have been Che Adams if it wasn't for Steve Clarke's negative tactics. 1 Quote
Jute Posted Monday at 19:00 Report Posted Monday at 19:00 Messi with great 2nd to seal it and move further ahead in goal record race. 1 Quote
swaddon Posted 23 hours ago Author Report Posted 23 hours ago Portugal 3 up on Uzbekistan in the first half. The auld fella scored twice. Quote
Jupiter Posted 22 hours ago Report Posted 22 hours ago Its the year 2066 and an 81 year old Ronaldo is still playing for Portugal in the world cup. Quote
Radiored Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago 1 hour ago, Jupiter said: Its the year 2066 and an 81 year old Ronaldo is still playing for Portugal in the world cup. Its the year 2066 and Scotland are still favouring Dykes and Adams up front. Quote
RicoS321 Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago Ghana trying to stay solid, sneak a goal, knowing that if they get a draw or lose by a single goal they're still likely to go through. Quote
Kowalski Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago Said it in another thread but £70M for Gordon looks ridiculous. Quote
Radiored Posted 20 hours ago Report Posted 20 hours ago Ah find masel in the strange situation o' cheerin' on England .... primarily because an England win is 'potentially' good for Scotland's chances .... but holy fuck ... makin' a right pigs ear o' it. ... So far they've been absolutely shite .... an' borin' as fuck. 1 Quote
Kowalski Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago Ghana seem to be playing against 12 men. Quote
Radiored Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago 4 minutes ago, Kowalski said: Ghana seem to be playing against 12 men. .... As evidence by that challenge by the England keeper on 'Prince'(?) .... had decision gone the other (correct) way, it was a last man challenge, and clear goal scorin' opp .... hence, red card for Pickford - that's how I saw it onywye - despite still hopin' for a Nigels win. Quote
Radiored Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago (edited) ... OK, change o' heart ..... England would only 'potentially' help Scotland if they won by at least two goals .... so fuck it ... 0-0 .... 80 mins on the clock .... C'mon Ghana!!! Edited 19 hours ago by Radiored Quote
RicoS321 Posted 19 hours ago Report Posted 19 hours ago Ghanaians go through with a shitfest draw. Their fans must be embarrassed. No point in going if you don't go for it. 1 Quote
Kowalski Posted 11 hours ago Report Posted 11 hours ago So Pickford should’ve been sent off and Ghana should have a penalty in a separate incident and now this… Quote
Radiored Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago One o' the mair intertainin' moments o' the game was when the commentator described an England shot at goal as hittin' the bar .... the replay showed that said shot was deflected wide by a Ghana defender -- aboot 9 inches aff the deck Quote
Slim Posted 5 hours ago Report Posted 5 hours ago 5 hours ago, Kowalski said: So Pickford should’ve been sent off and Ghana should have a penalty in a separate incident and now this… Apparently there can be discretion applied if the "discussion" is deemed to be "friendly". https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/articles/c70y1ljdz8zo So you're free to call someone whatever you like as long as you do so with a pat on the back. Quote
swaddon Posted 5 hours ago Author Report Posted 5 hours ago If you were having a "friendly word" with someone, why would you cover your mouth? Quote
RicoS321 Posted 2 hours ago Report Posted 2 hours ago 2 hours ago, swaddon said: If you were having a "friendly word" with someone, why would you cover your mouth? Because it might have been at someone else's expense? Or just perverted. It's a ridiculous rule, but not as ridiculous as close ups on players speaking and attempting to lip-read them in order to hold them accountable for some perceived injustice. Quote
wokinginashearerwonderland Posted 1 hour ago Report Posted 1 hour ago The game has gone. Almiron sent off for exactly the same thing. Curious to know if the outcome of this would have been different if it had been Kane instead of Bellingham. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.