Garlogie_Granite

I think it's more failure to create enough clear cut chances. We need a "can opener" in midfield.

I apologise to the loon in the other thread whom I called mental. (Tho surely this is fat postie guesswork, not a genuine possibility?)

OK then, what qualities do you see in Clangers that would justify this mentalness?

oh boy

Carmichael has to go surely? He seems to think a simple apology and not taking his "severance pay" from the Scottish office are sufficient, indicating in his mind his crime is but a mere smidgen. Everything, everything that is wrong with Westminster epitomised in this toad.

Yup a long succession of keeprs through the doors, none of whom have improved, it was time Jim.. Derek - "I would like to thank Jim for his contribution as a member of my team since I arrived at the Club". - the lack of any warmth or mention of his coaching ability tells all you need to know from this statement.

are you mental? A guy with little ability to coach others?

That's a great point, so highly likely under Nicola's current UK wide wave of popularity, that the SNP would have had significantly more MPs than the 56 we've actually got, and that many of the UKIP protest votes would very well have gone to the SNP.

Does creepy have no shame?

Erm no, about a fifth of the SNP. The SNP stood in 8% of seats, were there any seats that UKIP didnt stand in?

hud 'at

Nothing else, just an apology. You made a mistake, that's all.

an apology for repeating the words of a lying cunt you lying cunt

Kezia would be worried that if there was over than 70% then people who had only ever voted in indyref were voting? Can she be any more mental? #votekeziagetspanners

Jackie Bird, wearing a dress that already looks splattered with white blotches, saves me the trouble

Seriously? posted at half nine when the story was already totally and utterly rubbished by 4pm? Could you be any more anti-SNP? I'm thinking "where this one takes us" is an apology from you?

He doesn't always by any means dress as a wifie. Why did they do it in Glasgow? Hmmm, the SNP make great play of equality in all aspects of their policies, so what better way to show them up as "hypocrites" than to have a cross-dresser getting abused in the middle of Glasgow. Oh fuck, that didna work, fit noo?

Nobody is saying that. however, 1. The point is creepy has form for setting this sort of thing up, & 2. The activists got a "tip-off" about where creepy would be appearing, as did the press who had already written their stories. Regardless, lets look at the actual story here - creepy goes about shouting in public, three guys shout back, which has happened many times before, but somehow this time it's a "violent mob". And you don't think there was a plan here? Put another way, you don't think Izzard dressing up as a wifie and then going walkies in Glasgow wasn't done deliberately as they thought they'd get some sort of homo-phobic abuse that they could peddle? When that failed to transpire they had to run with "violent", even though there was no suggestion of that whatsoever?

Come on now K, after all we saw at IndyRef, and having had a couple of days to digest this, you don't think this was Murphy's intent all along?

Well, within minutes, local journals such as the Basingstoke gazette, a publication I'd be pretty sure reports daily on the goings on in Glasgow, had an item up online on the "violence" in Glasgow. Elsewhere, the twitter account of Cliff Morgan (The Kilted kelpie), one of Blair McDougall's henchmen, posted "I was in the crowd today in Glasgow, it was a warzone". Sadly for him, he forgot to turn off his location - Bulgaria

Like the unending boring pish we've seen in the TV debates where the "winners" of indyref want to bring up a non-existent call for indyref2, your point is not relevant to the debate. By all means start a new topic on hypotheticals, b ut lets get back on topic oinstead of talking utter pish. Thanks G_G

But your point is bollocks. There will NEVER be any sort of SNP/Tory alliance. And n o, I don't - despite being a lifelong SNP voter - want a stronger SNP voice at Westminster, I want a stronger SCOTTISH voice, and that means not dealing with a party who have proved, especially in the last month, that Scotland means fuck all to them.

It's sickening, but I think we should too, and not stop to their level. I would however expect a round of applause for our players as they line up, then a massive fucking boo as the dirty smelly minks come out, and then a round of applause for our players again as their 'guard' breaks up.

And why did that first party go tits up again? Which is exactly (other than you know - there are no points of agreement) why the SNP won't deal with a Tory party that Scotland has made clear for over 20 years they want no part of.