Jump to content

Sunday 19th May 2024:  kick-off 3pm

Scottish Premiership - Ross County v Aberdeen

🔴⚪️ Come on you Reds! ⚪🔴

InversneckieDob

Members
  • Posts

    162
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by InversneckieDob

  1.  

    What's the make of the boiler

     

    Hinna got a scooby Buc.....Rhino something, would that be right?

     

    If I could be arsed gan to the back Utility Room (or glory hole) and checking I would.

     

    I'll hae a deek next time I'm passing.

  2. I've just found this thread.

     

    It's great.

     

    I live in Easter Ross........ya tossers.

     

    And I have  a fucking dazzy of a boiler.

     

    And an extended warranty on my motor.

     

    LIVING THE FUCKING DREAM!!

  3. I've been following the NFL for years but still haven't made it to a game, despite having been to the NBA and NHL  ???

     

    Follow the Giants as I went to primary school with their "Scottish" ex kicker Lawrence Tynes for a few years. The Giants won two Superbowls while he was there  :thumbsup:

    First player to score a point in a competitive game on UK soil....at Wembley, born in Scotland. I like that.

  4. I was at Twickers Sunday fr the game.

     

    Massive Jints fan (second only t the Dons in my affections) and was delighted wi the win.

     

    Cracking couple of days in That London, but be fuck thons a dear whoor o' a place.

  5. No.

     

    There's only one man who can answer the Nation's call, one man who can lead Scotland back to a major final for the first time in a generation.

     

    Will that man come forward? Will he do his patriotic duty?

     

    Ladies and Gentlemen, pray silence for ......

    LORD JAMES GOVAN CALDERWOOD

     

     

    Jimmy%2BCalderwood.jpg

  6. This could be a remarkably coincidental day. I may have just discovered that I know another poster and if your first name begins with G and is sometimes misspelled starting with a J and you grew up in the flats at Hazlehead, I may know you too!

    No, I'm nae but I know the guy you mean very well, if we're talking about a formerly moustached volleyball player who liked a bet on the horses.

    Worked with him for the best part of a decade before moving to the Highlands.

  7. No I don't believe there is (though I'm nae expert).

     

    Put simply, Moorov is used by the Crown to convict, rather than the defence to establish reasonable doubt.

     

    Moorov is used as a  source of corroboration, basically a series of events, or a "course of conduct", can be viewed as corroboration for individual single events.

  8. Moorov is usually used as an evidential tool, rather than a defence mechanism (basically, course of conduct used as corroboration).

     

    The reason this probably would never have come to court here is due to the requirement for corroboration.

     

    Bit like the Goodwillie case.

  9. Going back a bit, Harry Melrose, moderate success at Dunfermline.

     

    Jim Clunie, ditto St Mirren, Killie.

     

    Jimmy Hogg, Stoney Juniors.

     

    Stevie Murray, briefest of brief stints at Forfar and a slightly longer stint at Montrose.

     

    John Docherty (one appearance for the first team) managed Caley in the Highland League and has caretakered a couple of times at ICT.

     

    Jimmy Wilson managed Elgin City.

     

    I think Graham Leggatt managed in.......was it Canada?

     

    Billy Little managed in the lower leagues, Falkirk (I think) and others.

     

     

  10. The whole thing is a fucked up wye o' deein' ad naebody comes out of this looking good.

     

    Ched Evans is a loathsome, self-entitled, morally bankrupt snake.

     

    Whether or not he is also a rapist, as was said higher up, only 2, well, maybe 3, people know.

     

    And to be honest it sounds like even they might not have the clearest recollection.

     

    In Scotland, due to different rules on evidence, I'm pretty sure this case would never have got anywhere near a court.

     

    I'm nae saying I agree or disagree with that, but I reckon it's the factual position.

     

    One of the main points of contention seems to be the use of the lassie's previous sexual history.

     

    Now, that's a highly vexed issue.

    On one hand, rape is rape, whether the victim is historically promiscuous or not.

     

    On the other hand, if a girl has previous for consenting then regretting, then crying rape....

     

    Look at it this way, if one Saturday night some guy tried to brain you with a bottle in front of nae witnesses.

     

    You defend yourself, using reasonable force, in the course of which the first guy is injured.

     

    You get charged with assault and need to defend yourself.

     

    Transpires you find many other witnesses that say this guy attacked them with a bottle on previous occasions.

     

    Is that relevant to the present case?

     

    I'm nae expressing an opinion here, one way or t'other, I just think this is a really, really gray area legally.

     

     

×
×
  • Create New...