Author Topic: Alex Salmond  (Read 6589 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline Ten Caat

  • Midfield Maestro
  • ****
  • Posts: 2671
  • Rating: 33
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #60 on: February 11, 2019, 04:36:49 PM »
Why? Did we offend you? You didn't have to read it.

If you hadn't found our various discussions so offensive, you might have seen that I was objecting to another poster saying that Salmond wouldn't get a fair trial. He decided to introduce my use of "karma" in another thread (or threads) as an insult and I asked him, fruitlessly thus far, what he meant by this. From that discussion, he asked for "enlightenment" and our discussion went into other fields. The subject of closed minds and lack of imaginations were put on the table in relation to Salmond's upcoming trial, subjects that are equally applicable to religion and art so it wasn't a random diversion, not that there's anything wrong in that. So shut the fuck up you moron.

Read every word btw. Not offended in the slightest. Just bored the tits aff me.

Offline Tyrant

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 9604
  • Rating: 118
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #61 on: February 12, 2019, 11:37:59 AM »
Why? Did we offend you? You didn't have to read it.

If you hadn't found our various discussions so offensive, you might have seen that I was objecting to another poster saying that Salmond wouldn't get a fair trial. He decided to introduce my use of "karma" in another thread (or threads) as an insult and I asked him, fruitlessly thus far, what he meant by this. From that discussion, he asked for "enlightenment" and our discussion went into other fields. The subject of closed minds and lack of imaginations were put on the table in relation to Salmond's upcoming trial, subjects that are equally applicable to religion and art so it wasn't a random diversion, not that there's anything wrong in that. So shut the fuck up you moron.

I believe that you are well aware of exactly what I meant. I'm not speaking in riddles or in Dutch. 

Offline rocket_scientist

  • Club Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 6510
  • Rating: -194
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #62 on: February 13, 2019, 11:13:09 AM »
No you're not speaking in riddles nor Dutch but despite repeated requests, you are reluctant to explain yourself;

Then again every time a grown man who tirelessly tries to portray himself as an intellect mentions "karma" I take him less seriously than I did before.

Putting aside your insulting "grown man" and "tries to portray himself as an intellect", why does my use of "karma" in other threads devalue any points that I made?

What interpretation of "karma" did you attribute to me and why was it so offensive?

I think you'll find that I'm speaking in plain English too.
Ancient Sound, Modern Noise

Offline Garlogie_Granite

  • First Team Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 747
  • Rating: 13
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #63 on: February 14, 2019, 09:55:44 AM »
But I also said it's important to define the subject first, before choosing to investigate or not, before accepting or rejecting.

What is the subject? The Vatican? The catholic church? Religion itself? I think the catholic church is an evil organisation so why would I give money to it? Why would any non-believer give money to see stolen gold? I know what's in there but fucked if I'm paying to see it.
OK, so it's important to investigate a subject properly, unless it's something you define as unworthy of investigation, in which case you'll just spout your opinion. What a fucking hypocritical pseudo-intellectual wank you are. You're an utter fraud. Bet you're really 5'2" with a 3" cock  :thumbsup:

Online RicoS321

  • Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 3264
  • Rating: 75
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #64 on: February 14, 2019, 11:15:24 AM »
Bet you're really 5'2" with a 3" cock  :thumbsup:

Fit's that in metric?

Offline rocket_scientist

  • Club Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 6510
  • Rating: -194
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #65 on: February 14, 2019, 11:26:53 AM »
Fit's that in metric?

1.575 m and 7.62 cm - when flaccid, unerect (hopefully).

Get the converter App. Get with the beat. Use technology, don't be afraid of it.
Ancient Sound, Modern Noise

Offline Elgindon

  • Star Striker
  • ****
  • Posts: 1367
  • Rating: 25
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #66 on: February 14, 2019, 06:14:01 PM »
Bet you're really 5'2" with a 3" cock  :thumbsup:

 What about it?    ???

Offline rocket_scientist

  • Club Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 6510
  • Rating: -194
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #67 on: February 14, 2019, 06:27:11 PM »
What about it?    ???

Don't wind it up. It can't think properly. It can't read properly. It's granite thick.

Interesting hypothesis about how the typical NE man is such a thick cunt. Traditionally men of the earth - fishers and farmers - they lack the imagination and education to consider anything outwith their (incredibly) narrow frame of reference. This leads them to reject anything to do with subjects such as religion and art, before they've even considered the arguments, incapable of doing so as they are.
Ancient Sound, Modern Noise

Offline rocket_scientist

  • Club Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 6510
  • Rating: -194
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #68 on: February 15, 2019, 02:26:04 AM »
Two things happened in the last hour which reminded me of this thread.

During a very moving documentary on Bowie's last five years on BBC4, Visconti gave a great description about the point of art in the context of him not giving interviews latterly.

A friend sent me a pic where a quote attributed to Leonardo da Vinci said - There are three classes of people: those who see, those who see when shown, and those who do not see. I replied with - Those who make things happen, those who watch things happen and those who go "shit, what happened?"

I guess Salmond might fall into the category of trying to make sex happen but he wasn't attractive enough to his target for consummation to take place. He only then could see, when shown by the non-consent that he's really not that desirable nor powerful after all. Sad old creep. Allegedly. Possibly.
Ancient Sound, Modern Noise

Offline Garlogie_Granite

  • First Team Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 747
  • Rating: 13
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #69 on: February 15, 2019, 03:10:16 AM »
.It can't think properly. It can't read properly. It's granite thick.

it can't think properly. It can't read properly. It contradicts itself constantly. It's a fucking rocket.

Online donsdaft

  • Midfield Maestro
  • ****
  • Posts: 2426
  • Rating: -53
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #70 on: February 15, 2019, 03:26:59 PM »
C'mon Alex


Get stuck into these bastards.


Offline Ten Caat

  • Midfield Maestro
  • ****
  • Posts: 2671
  • Rating: 33
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #71 on: February 15, 2019, 03:42:16 PM »
That's precisely what landed him in bother in the first place.....

Online donsdaft

  • Midfield Maestro
  • ****
  • Posts: 2426
  • Rating: -53
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #72 on: February 15, 2019, 03:52:51 PM »
Never been any word of him feeling up blokes in the bar in Westminster.

That would have been seen as more acceptable I presume.

Offline Kowalski

  • Global Moderator
  • ****
  • Posts: 14627
  • Rating: -17
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #73 on: Yesterday at 06:29:53 PM »
I can’t believe there are some window lickers that think this is some sort of set-up.

Given the list of charges it is very difficult to imagine that Salmond could be innocent of ALL of them.

Offline rocket_scientist

  • Club Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 6510
  • Rating: -194
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #74 on: Yesterday at 07:14:33 PM »
I can’t believe there are some window lickers that think this is some sort of set-up.

Given the list of charges it is very difficult to imagine that Salmond could be innocent of ALL of them.

I wasn't aware of anyone protesting his innocence. And unless they were there, how could they?

Legally speaking, there is something called the Moroov doctrine which may come into play here. It's worth checking out online. it's a beautiful concept, invented by us Scots in criminal law matters.

Me Too is a manifestation of the same principle.

Never liked Salmond. Slippery cunt. Almost wanted to take him by the lapels in Fraserburgh Golf Club 25+ years ago when he couldn't answer the simplest of questions - what is your handicap? Given that every participant had to have an official handicap in order to compete, or at least be eligible for the prizes at the Pro-Am, his sidestepping was a thing of political habit but like a hound with a bone, I never let go. He was an arse already but I made him look like an even bigger one in front of a dozen or so.

Don't like Sturgeon either. Her crime is that she doesn't get enough good sex. Salmond's crime may be that whilst he doesn't get enough either (given the extraordinary age-gap between he and his his wife), he may have attempted to supplement this shortfall by abusing his perceived position of celebrity/power. He's a fucking wank onyhoo. And that's from someone who is VERY pro Scottish Independence and always has been.
Ancient Sound, Modern Noise

Offline Garlogie_Granite

  • First Team Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 747
  • Rating: 13
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #75 on: Yesterday at 07:28:18 PM »
Some interesting comments from "John Adams" on facebook, and Craig Murray and @mairstheshame on twitter.



Online RicoS321

  • Captain
  • ****
  • Posts: 3264
  • Rating: 75
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #76 on: Yesterday at 08:08:59 PM »
Some interesting comments from "John Adams" on facebook, and Craig Murray and @mairstheshame on twitter.

It is basic forum ettiquette to provide links ye ken. I'm not saying it's worse than what Salmond is accused of, but it's up there.

I don't believe it is a setup, but I could imagine a situation where 10 of the complaints wouldn't have made it anywhere near a court but 1 of the complaints was evidenced enough to bring the others forward.

If all else fails, then they'll at least get him on breach of the peace, which I assume is why it's in there (a certain charge, to bring the whole case forward)? I've nae idea how these things work like.

Is Moorov the one they tried to get rid of a few years back Rocket? Corroboration of witnesses who didn't witness or some such?

Offline rocket_scientist

  • Club Legend
  • *****
  • Posts: 6510
  • Rating: -194
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #77 on: Yesterday at 09:05:15 PM »
It is basic forum ettiquette to provide links ye ken. I'm not saying it's worse than what Salmond is accused of, but it's up there.

Exactly what I was thinking. Granite-heided lazy thick cunt.


Is Moorov the one they tried to get rid of a few years back Rocket? Corroboration of witnesses who didn't witness or some such?

There was talk about it earlier this decade. Put simply it's this;

Criminal burden of proof requires corroboration. This means one person's word isn't enough. It needs corroborated by other evidence, which can be circumstantial. However, when you have a number of different complaints against the same perpetrator for the same crime (five in the case of HMA v. Moorov if I recall), none of which can be corroborated by further individual evidence on each then the number of same complaints can be taken into consideration to corroborate them all. Fucking class.
Ancient Sound, Modern Noise

Offline Ten Caat

  • Midfield Maestro
  • ****
  • Posts: 2671
  • Rating: 33
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #78 on: Yesterday at 11:48:34 PM »
Extremely inconvenient timing for this to crop up in the middle of a general election campaign. No matter how much she tries to deflect.....Sturgeon was his deputy when all this was happening. I'd like to think it wouldn't cost the SNP any votes but I'm sure it will.

Salmond was a smooth operator as First Minister. Probably the best we have had to date in the relatively brief history of Holyrood. But as a person he is a total cunt. I've no doubt whatsoever of his guilt and hop he gets what's coming.

Offline Garlogie_Granite

  • First Team Regular
  • ****
  • Posts: 747
  • Rating: 13
Re: Alex Salmond
« Reply #79 on: Today at 01:22:46 AM »
Exactly what I was thinking. Granite-heided lazy thick cunt.


There was talk about it earlier this decade. Put simply it's this
sorry, I'd kinda assumed someone speaking with so much authority on politics would be following these people themselves already? I was and am on my phone, where copying links to facebook and twitter is a pain in the arse so didn't do it.. That OK ye arse?