Guest Robo Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 yeah, i know. i was just having a joke. but, hey ho... I know you were. I laughed, I found it funny. I was caught. . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyrshireDon Posted December 28, 2007 Share Posted December 28, 2007 However, the startled Aberdeen forward didn't live up to his pre-match boasts and refused to react to Ferguson, who escaped punishment for his retaliation. i.e. there is no fucking story! The boy was having a bit of banter with a mate of his & all of a sudden this is "news". Had Maguire reacted when that jolly decent young scallywag Ferguson had him by the throat (which would have been reason enough without these "pre-match boasts") then there might be some merit to the story. Instead he chose to laugh in the face of a guy that should've known better than let an 18yr old wind him up by niggling at him as the ball went out of play. You almost feel as if the Record are raging that there is no real story.... imagine the mayhem had he reacted to the choke-hold & lamped the p**** (it was Fergie that was the p**** wasn't it??) & then this "story" had broke! Had Maguire sat in a press conference before the Rangers game & said "That fud Ferguson & the tit Hutton be warned because this scrawny wee fucker is out to get you" then there is a story. A pretty laughable one considering his size & the stupid blonde hair, but a story none-the-less. He didn't though! Maguire should know better than to make comments like this when they can (and will) be dragged up by the gutter press. However I have no problem with him winding these guys up On a totally different note, it was interesting to witness the actions of both Hutton & Ferguson on Sunday , which would in NO WAY suggest that either was in any way a p**** or a ****! I take it that the Rangers Supporters boy had a go at both of these players for their stupidity (with all the medals & experience that they've gained playing at Mordor) in costing his side a victory?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mizer Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 I think Maguire had his earphones in all day yesterday as he never reacted to any of our songs sung at him; BEBO, BEBO, BEBO/We hate rangers more than you/one Chris Maguire Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest swaddon Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Maybe he meant he was going to take Barry Ferguson out for dinner after the match? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TENEMENTFUNSTER Posted December 30, 2007 Share Posted December 30, 2007 Maybe he meant he was going to take Barry Ferguson out for dinner after the match? Judging by his haircut, very possible. That and his constant referrals to their penises. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aberdeen_Ladette Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 I'm going to stand up for him, he left a message on his rangers mates site having a bit of banter - are we no longer allowed to have a laugh? If it had been Ferguson throttled and not Maguire he would have been sent off, but instead he laughed in that hun cunts face. All this is a smear campaign by hun bastards to deflect the behavior of Barry Ferguson. totally agree Whilst I don't believe the "hacker" story, what I find strange is the date quoted that he apparantly made these comments...... 20th December - the day of the Copenhagen game Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
phil-stellaartois-mcguire Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 so what if he did. he is allowed to have an opinion and allowed to voice it. If he had acted upon his words, then that would not have been allowed. It's no worse than someone who works for BP saying "I hate Mr X that works for Shell, I'm going to get him later". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aberdeen_Ladette Posted December 31, 2007 Share Posted December 31, 2007 so what if he did. he is allowed to have an opinion and allowed to voice it. If he had acted upon his words, then that would not have been allowed. It's no worse than someone who works for BP saying "I hate Mr X that works for Shell, I'm going to get him later". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.