comment earlier about cosgrove being ‘big’  but being a pussy he isnt getting proper conditioning training, mcginn a stone overweight , ferguson overweight, a lot of hype re ronaldos header this week , he does specific training to enable that , and thats arguably one of the best players ever, look at salah mane .. listen i get technically our players cant be world beaters  but they can  be physically.. there is no excuse for this

 

Cosgrove was on red Tv just last week wit Logan doing a walkround of the new training facility. Specifically says that he now stays around at least an extra hour every day to do gym work after training now that the facilities allow it.

 

Ferguson doesn't look overweight to me. McGinn...maybe but at his age he may well be limited as to how much training his body can take without risking the training itself causing injury.

 

What you have to realise is that everyone's body is different. Hence why sprinters are shite long distance runners and vice versa. Or why shot putters are dreadful at high jump ( the obvious exceptions to the rule being the decathletes/heptathletes who are just natural all-rounders). And in football, a 6ft 3 centre half makes a horrendous winger and a 5ft 8 winger makes a uselessl centre half. But in all cases...they reach an optimal level of fitness required for their specific discipline. If they don't....they don't get picked.

 

 

Good post TC. Sums it up nicely.

Didnt see the reply actually its horseshit......these players are not pushed to their limits to be physical specimens, Mcginn as had too much beer at least a stone overweight, Ferguson looks 'chunky'  all these guys can get stronger and fitter, leaner  thats my point ... have a look at Mo Salah... Troare at Wolves..

You are just wrong. As I said....everyone's physiology is different. And it changes as we get older. Indeed the WHO definition of "middle aged" begins at age 25.

 

Every club of a decent level has a sports scientist working with the coaches/physios/medical department. This is a relatively new concept, only really starting about 20 or so years ago. So todays players, whether you believe it or not, are most certainly fitter and in better condition than those in the 80s and further back. Whether they are better natural footballers you can certainly debate......I'd suggest not as back in the old days there was no internet and game consoles were hugely expensive and relatively basic. Kids spent every minute they could outside playing....boys would play football almost non stop in long summer days. They'd also start smoking at 14 or so and be out at the pub every weekend from the minute they could get served. Eating a diet now recognised as pretty unhealthy.....and they kept this up through their careers. Sports science and general education has almost eliminated all these bad habits (Dean Campbell apparently is a heavy smoker....he will pay for that in his career and I'm prepared to say that Aberdeen will be the pinnacle of it)

 

Even evolution plays a part in not just football, but every sport. Players of every sport are far taller and have a bigger muscle mass than those 50 years ago. Hence why world records have been smashed. But as I say...everyone is different and the ageing process cannot be halted (well actually it can....the USSR and Easter European countries in the 60s/70s/80s gave certain sportsmen and women artificial hormones to delay puberty and keep them artificially small (gymnasts) or in other cases to bulk up their physique ( throwing or strength based sports and sprinting) or to enable longer endurance......all of whom are now dead or suffering horrendous side effects. Olga Korbut the gymnast looked about 70 when she was only in her early 40s).

 

Lastly...the training in itself can be a risk. As we age, our tissues naturally become less elastic. Thankfully sports science now realises this. So training programmes are devised for each individual player or athlete. So sportsmen and women now have longer careers. Over training in "elderly" sportsmen can and usually will cause more problems than just keeping up basic fitness, So don't expect McGinn to lose the extra stone or so he looks to be carrying any time soon. Indeed it's probably the same reason why Gleeson has never been fit in his time with us and will likely end his career (at a decent level anyway) at a relatively young age. They just cannot do the training they were able to even 3 years ago. Some players in their mid 30s do almost no training at all during the week, barring some basic jogging and low risk warming up "looseners",  indeed a few do absolutely nothing at all barring playing once a week. In football....every player these days has an individual file, It contains all their medical records, any dietary advice given/recommended body mass index, recommended training programmes and then....details of every day's training that the participate in. This follows the player to every club he joins. Of course completing this is hugely time consuming hence why admin staffing levels and costs have gone through the roof since the 90s.

 

 

 

I think both of you are correct to an extent. The modern player should be shredded, that’s a fact. With the amount of physical training and sports science behind it, the footballers body should be in great shape. I’d suggest the likes of Ferguson and McGinn have diet/nutrition issues. Does Ferguson love a good mars bar? Are they knocking back pints? Pizza suppers and chippies? What’s the carb intake? Particularly with McGinn and injuries, his diet is more important than ever because he’s not burning what he used to since I’m sure he trains less.

 

I’m 47 and in good shape. By no means am I a naturally skinny guy, I can gain weight. Athletic Director at my school and I work closely with my athletic trainer and strength/conditioning coach. I was shredded at 43 then had kids so not so fit now but still good. I’d argue that the dons footballers do way more training than me, but I have many of them on diet. That’s the key and based on what I see with them that’s where the difference is. I’d expect that Mo Salah and Ronaldo kill our boys in what they put into their bodies.

 

Lastly, reading rocket and others talking about not drinking in January. Since new year I went back to the non holiday diet, no booze, minimal extra sugar, monitoring carb and protein intake, drinking lots of water. Since October it’s been ‘candy’ with kids at Halloween, then thanksgiving, Christmas, new year and I chunked up a bit. Since January 1 I have lost 8 pounds. I’m still 11 pounds heavier than when I was in my best shape at 43. I’d argue that McGinn and Ferguson are fit but change their diet and they’d drop a stone. I played too but if I can do that at 47, and I have had knee, ankle surgeries and other injuries, no reason to think mcginn and Ferguson can’t too.

I will add, pretty sure it was John Collins who first bought into the real professional footballers lifestyle in regards to health, fitness, diet and nutrition, during his time in France. He was laughed at endlessly when he came back here and was called a freak, but even when we was part of the coaching staff at Celtic he was way fitter and healthier than most of the players.

 

Salah and Ronaldo have the resources that certainly help, no doubt with personal chefs, trainers etc to ensure that body is at its maximum efficiency. Ferguson and McGinn certainly don’t have that luxury, and the fact that we even employee a smoker to play for us tells you that there are issues at the club and our boys aren’t in proper peak condition. That should never happen in this day and age.

Some very interesting and knowledgeable posts on this thread.

 

This caught my eye: -

 

But in all cases...they reach an optimal level of fitness required for their specific discipline. If they don't....they don't get picked.

 

That's the theory but there will be variances due to who's doing the picking.

 

I have no access to their medical/ fitness/ strength and conditioning/ nutritional files. All I have is experience, which includes watching professional football over a period of seven decades now, as well as 57.5 years of life plus working very closely with professional athletes, some of whom earning more in a year than every AFC footballer earns in a playing career. One of my best mates is a kinesiologist and I am well aware of the importance of physical conditioning without having detailed knowledge of what current trends are in football and at AFC. I'm also aware than some practitioners are better than others, in every field. Some lawyers are worth fifty times more than the average hack, some doctors are incompetent whilst others have an amazing instinct for healing, in every field there are massive differences between the best and the worst.

 

Whatever they're doing at the state of the art training facility on the road to Westhill, and whatever they've been doing for seven years, the only question at the end of the day is is it working?

 

Before that question can be answered, we need to know the objective and the game. We also need to appreciate that one man is in charge of everything pertaining to the "football side of the business".

 

Football is not an endurance sport. It's not as dependent on physical bulking as the East German shot putters. It's not as reliant on muscle mass composition and breathing efficiency as the cyclists. Physique and physical conditioning is very important in football, of course it is but it's only one part of the equation. Technical and mental factors are also equally important to overall performance, both individually and (as it is a team game) collectively.

 

Yesterday the difference between the two SPFL games shown on Sky was stark. St Mirren and Aberdeen was littered with errors including unforced errors, losing possession carelessly and passes going astray in every minute of the game. At Tynecastle, not only were there far fewer unforced errors, the pace of the game was way faster and sharper. The Hearts and Rangers players were hungrier and played with an intensity and desire which was in stark contrast to the previous shambles, despite Gerrard "not recognising" his team.

 

Hearts are bottom of the league for fuck sake so why, under their new manager can they show enough to beat the league leaders (or at least they would've been if they'd won their game in hand) whereas AFC under their old manager couldn't show enough to threaten the goal of a very shit club who despite being managed well by all accounts have no chance of top six?

 

They all go on about how Aberdeen are a "physical side" but I don't care how many fouls Cosgrove and Ferguson give away. I don't care if McKenna uses his size to bump into, hassle and frustrate the opposition. All I do know is that results are the most important measure of overall effectiveness and something hasn't been working for a very long time.

 

McInnes DOES pick players who aren't good enough, whatever their personal files says. He recruited them! A system is only as good as the people who implement and manage it. Their condition looks far from "optimal" to me but even if it was on a par with Rangers and Hearts, they're not capable of performing like that, with sharp crisp passing, controlling it instantly and attacking with desire, pace and imagination. The technical skills are poor and their motivation levels are so bad. However physically fit they might be isn't producing a product worth watching and it's getting worse.

McInnes DOES pick players who aren't good enough, whatever their personal files says. He recruited them! A system is only as good as the people who implement and manage it. Their condition looks far from "optimal" to me but even if it was on a par with Rangers and Hearts, they're not capable of performing like that, with sharp crisp passing, controlling it instantly and attacking with desire, pace and imagination. The technical skills are poor and their motivation levels are so bad. However physically fit they might be isn't producing a product worth watching and it's getting worse.

 

I'd probably go along with that. I trust the sports scientist guys to get it - for the most part - correct. We're a fit team as far as I can see. Ferguson looks absolutely fine for a young loon too, and I think McGinn just has a different body shape rather than a weight issue. Very difficult to tell without seeing them with their tops off, which I don't think is necessary! McGinn also works his arse off in games, including St Mirren, but often with little return. The midfield have been in and out through injury, so it's difficult to tell. For me, the biggest thing is the amount of wasted energy in a game. We have players moving up and down, but we're too slow to move the ball. Ferguson covered a huge amount of ground at the weekend coming back into his preferred position and back up the pitch again. We're making the wrong runs in the wrong areas, and taking a first "possession" touch backwards where a turn would be more efficient. Furthermore, we keep players that aren't performing on for far too long, expending more fruitless energy. McInnes loves this type of shite, there's no way on earth he won't be monitoring players' distance travelled, heart rates, diets etc., he just misses the tactical basics all too often. That results in wasted energy, and also lethargy as our own players [must] see that things are not working.

For me, the biggest thing is the amount of wasted energy in a game. We have players moving up and down, but we're too slow to move the ball.

 

You raise another important aspect in the whole equation, tactics and strategy.

 

For me (and following my need to simplify the complex) football is threefold;

 

Physical, Technical and Mental, with tactics coming under the Technical umbrella (alongwith basic individual skills of course, the ability to trap, pass and kick a ba).

 

In context, the conditioning of the players is nowhere near the top of the list of areas for focus and improvement. They look fit enough for the job overall without being physically impressive. There's an argument that they would run and move the ball faster if they knew exactly what they're supposed to be doing and were confident both in their own capabilities (mental) and the overall game plan (technical) but that's an aside.

 

The biggest influencer in overall performance is the manager. This has always been the case and always will be. Before they can work on their physical, technical and mental skills, they have to be capable of performing at the level required which in the case of a club the size of AFC is to win stuff so recruitment (part of the remit of the technical abilities of the manager) is very important too. Every decade of my lifetime, Aberdeen won stuff, including the spectacular 80's which was a freak period of overachievement that nobody could have anticipated. Much as it was welcome and hugely enjoyable, we knew it could never last, even at the time. When Hewitt scored v. Real Madrid, I turned to my mate in the Ullevi and said "THIS is the pinnacle". That period was made possible by the hunger and the genius of the manager, probably the best manager of all time in the whole of football history, even though he had his faults too, as always, yin and yang. This century, AFC have had their leanest trophy return in all of our lifetimes.

 

McInnes should never be mentioned in the same breath as good and great managers of course, let alone the best. His performance record doesn't stand up. We see it in his players month in, year out. It takes just a basic level of critical thinking to pinpoint his specific weaknesses and it is for his boss to decide whether he can change and whether to pursue with him or not. I say that seven years of concrete evidence is screaming at us that he's not fit for purpose. At least he now knows that he's on his way out but it should never have taken this long to get rid of the charlatan midget cunt, just like Calderwood was given far too long and should never have been recruited.

 

Going back purely to the weight issue. I'm not doubting the effort and work ethic of McGinn and Ferguson, for the most part they are hard working players. But if you look at their bodies compared to other players questions get asked, especially with the amount of running. Imagine being 10 pounds lighter and doing the same job....you'd do it better and feel better!

 

I also acknowledge that with Ferguson he's young, not even a fully developed adult yet. He's definitely carrying baby weight but I highly doubt he has a professional diet. McGinn too, I'd argue that despite the work ethic he is less mobile now and a few pounds lighter would certainly help, and also help with the stress/injuries on the body carrying less weight.

why cant we be the fittest strongest team in the league ?

Last time I can recall a coach concentrating on the dons being the fittest team was a certain Alex Miller. Couple of times there were boasts the entire team could run a marathon.

 

Marathon runners they may have been. A winning football team on the other hand......

stupid feckless response

why cant we be the fittest strongest team in the league ?

 

I'm sure every team aspires to this. It probably could even be proved using individual training records although some of the criteria would be subjective. However as players age into their 30s their fitness just cannot be kept as it was in their peak years. And serious injury can limit capabilities even once considered recovered, age again playing it's part.

 

I suspect that being considered the "fittest" team wouldn't make a helluva lot of difference. West Germany in the early 80s to early 90s went for this approach...their team was mainly composed of 6ft plus athletes with the odd smaller playmaker like Magath thrown in. Reached 3 successive World Cup Finals, winning the 1990 one but boy were they brutal to watch. They lost the 82 final to an Italian team full of chain-smokers and wine lovers...who played off the cuff and were a delight to watch. And lost the 86 final to an Argentine team with a rapidly bloating Maradona off his nut on cocaine (I still can't believe that the drug testers never caught him until 91), again full of chain-smokers and whose team were relative midgets compared to the Germans. Talent trumps being the absolute fittest....

 

What really matters is having as big a squad as possible nowadays. Both the arse cheeks are capable of playing 2 separate elevens that are capable of beating every other team.

 

 

Sports science and general education has almost eliminated all these bad habits (Dean Campbell apparently is a heavy smoker....he will pay for that in his career and I'm prepared to say that Aberdeen will be the pinnacle of it)

By all means, criticise his ability, as you're perfectly entitled to your opinion. But please don't pretend to know anything about his private life and continue to perpetuate absolute nonsense you've read on another chat site.

By all means, criticise his ability, as you're perfectly entitled to your opinion. But please don't pretend to know anything about his private life and continue to perpetuate absolute nonsense you've read on another chat site.

 

It is now incumbent on the accused to explain his sources.

 

Surprised he hadn't responded already given that he saw this last night?

By all means, criticise his ability, as you're perfectly entitled to your opinion. But please don't pretend to know anything about his private life and continue to perpetuate absolute nonsense you've read on another chat site.

 

Firstly Ollie, welcome to the site. Hope you'll hang around here.

Think most of us know the source of TC's comments regarding Deano.

My son and I were speaking about this at St Mirren on Sunday and both agreed we would be astounded if the claims were correct. In this day and age with all we now know, it would be madness for any professional athlete starting out in their career to indulge in such actions.

 

Would imagine you should know better than most the ins and outs of this.

Firstly Ollie, welcome to the site. Hope you'll hang around here.

Think most of us know the source of TC's comments regarding Deano.

My son and I were speaking about this at St Mirren on Sunday and both agreed we would be astounded if the claims were correct. In this day and age with all we now know, it would be madness for any professional athlete starting out in their career to indulge in such actions.

 

Would imagine you should know better than most the ins and outs of this.

 

Agreed. It's akin to gambling. The club would never allow it. Not even for the player's health, but the club's image. The first thing they'd do is get him help to stop, then he'd stop. If it's on a chat site, then the club would know about it and would have dealt with it. If it was on AFC chat then the club would likely know it's someone posting a wind up and would dismiss it. It's clearly not true. Kids vape these days anyway.

Firstly...I have to apologise to Ollie...and more importantly the loon himself

 

I did indeed get the info from elsewhere and stupidly took it as gospel. In my defence I did use the word "apparently" which was meant to signify that the info I was using was second hand but I could have made that a lot clearer.

 

Lesson learned

 

My apologies once again

Respect. Some men aren't man enough to admit their mistakes. As Marcellus said "that's pride fucking with you. Fuck pride". The wise man understands that we all make mistakes and that mistakes are good. It's how we learn. The shrimp of a man can't admit his mistakes because he erroneously thinks that making an error is a sign of incompetence and that admitting it is a sign of weakness. He is prepared to deny truth in order to perpetuate his sickness. 

Firstly Ollie, welcome to the site. Hope you'll hang around here.

Think most of us know the source of TC's comments regarding Deano.

My son and I were speaking about this at St Mirren on Sunday and both agreed we would be astounded if the claims were correct. In this day and age with all we now know, it would be madness for any professional athlete starting out in their career to indulge in such actions.

 

Would imagine you should know better than most the ins and outs of this.

Got a little knowledge about the subject!

Firstly...I have to apologise to Ollie...and more importantly the loon himself

 

I did indeed get the info from elsewhere and stupidly took it as gospel. In my defence I did use the word "apparently" which was meant to signify that the info I was using was second hand but I could have made that a lot clearer.

 

Lesson learned

 

My apologies once again

No problem at all, and apology happily accepted. I shouldn't have to explain, but I'll indulge. Someone, and I can't even recall who, signed up to AFC Chat in the summer to to have a go at Dean, saying he'd just saw him in the Chester hotel smoking area and that it was a disgrace how a young Aberdeen player was drinking and smoking etc etc. He was at the time 4000 miles away on holiday with his girlfriend. There's been a few tongue in cheek comments about it from regular posters since, which have clearly been picked up incorrectly. Now as I've said, I've no issue with people criticising his ability on the park, as players, especially youngsters trying to make their way will always divide opinion, but to sign up for a chat site with the specific intention of making up stories to discredit him is pretty poor. Maybe the guy genuinely thought it was him to be fair.

Interesting. I think the bigger issue is social media, how it's used and how it's perceived.

 

These comments are going to offend people so I should apologise in advance but as I'm really not sorry at all, I won't. I'm never sorry when stupid cunts get offended. I'm not even sorry if I offend non-stupid cunts. The act of being offended, of taking offence is a decision taken by the offendee, not an act inflicted by the offendor. There are exceptions to most rules of course and I see that Katie Hopkins has had her Twitter account pulled. I could never work that dumb bitch out, mostly because she wasn't dumb - I'm speaking of her in the past tense here, maybe I'm guilty of framing it through social media lenses too? - and has a robustly-functioning intellect, unfortunately coloured by much prejudice and coming out in that guffy nasally "we know best" tone really was offensive to anyone not similarly discoloured.

 

Here's the thing; people are becoming increasingly stupid. One of the biggest contributors to their imbecilic advancement is education, or the lack of it. Kids don't read these days. They don't have the attention spans. Sure they can read texts and tweets and look at pictures but investing ten hours to read a book and then engage in an exercise to interpret what they've just read and discuss it in the classroom, forget about it.

 

Without reading, proper reading, there is a limitation of vocabulary available to them. Without words, we fail to express and limiting our words limits our ability to express ourselves. Thinking, proper thinking, is only achievable when we have the capacity to see and the capacity to understand. This includes not understanding but having the critical thinking abilities to begin to tackle the subject that we don't understand which of course requires the desire and the motivation to want to learn and understand something that we don't at first, which needs words to ask the right questions, mainly of ourselves.

 

The most vile manifestation of the expanding thick cunt brigade are those who regurgitate something as truth without knowing it to be so, them not having the discipline to invest time to establish it for themselves. Tragically, they don't even consider whether it's true or not as they take as gospel anything they read, facilitated by an absence of integrity which, like education, is something in terminal decline. Teenagers have an excuse for being stupid. We as a society are engineering them that way but for a grown man to regurgitate something he read on a football forum as truth and repeating it often, that man should be exterminated from society and executed as an enemy of progress, plus any offspring he may have fathered.

 

Edit: that's wrong. An even worse manifestation is using social media to deliberately peddle a mistruth. That's active deception rather than the repeating that the exceptionally stupid do. The latter should still be shot. The former get a fair and proper trial and due process.

 

 

Was going to write a long detailed reply to rocket, but I've either not got the attention span to do it or perhaps its because I'm just not offended.

Got a little knowledge about the subject!

 

Yeah I know