redordead Posted December 6, 2010 Share Posted December 6, 2010 Am I the only one to notice that stark is being banded around everywhere for the past couple of days. Scotland today for instance. Interviewing fans ( randomers doon union st ) who only knew one name, the one they have seen all over the papers. Though I'd prefer Newell who they had at 3 to 1.( my choice before MMG debacle ) I really hope AFC do the full process this time, but have a horrible feeling that Stark will show up before the end of the week as the FANS favourite. The whole thing reeks of the old boys network and I hope I'm wrong. On an aside JC in the retard on Saturday, bumping his gums about how Milne made a mistake, how it was a happy group, how they'd been in europe, how surprised he was to get the boot. 3 wins out of 15 ya feckin eedjit, if you didn't see that coming you're a monkey son Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ajja Posted December 6, 2010 Share Posted December 6, 2010 Because it's easy. Most journalists are looking for the least work. Stark is the least work. Let's hope our Board aren't looking for the same easy route. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jmo Posted December 6, 2010 Share Posted December 6, 2010 On BBC news they said the same thing and interviewed three Aberdeen fans, only one of which mentioned Billy Stark by name before saying he thought he'd be too expensive, then two other people who reacted quite negatively to the idea. Looked more to me that the latter two had been asked about Billy Stark by the interviewer rather than it being their decision to start talking about him. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dave_min Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 On an aside JC in the retard on Saturday, bumping his gums about how Milne made a mistake, how it was a happy group, how they'd been in europe, how surprised he was to get the boot. Conveniently ignoring the fact that the whole McGhee experiment didn't work out Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KGB Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 Am I the only one to notice that stark is being banded around everywhere for the past couple of days. Scotland today for instance. Interviewing fans ( randomers doon union st ) who only knew one name, the one they have seen all over the papers. Though I'd prefer Newell who they had at 3 to 1.( my choice before MMG debacle ) I really hope AFC do the full process this time, but have a horrible feeling that Stark will show up before the end of the week as the FANS favourite. The whole thing reeks of the old boys network and I hope I'm wrong. On an aside JC in the retard on Saturday, bumping his gums about how Milne made a mistake, how it was a happy group, how they'd been in europe, how surprised he was to get the boot. 3 wins out of 15 ya feckin eedjit, if you didn't see that coming you're a monkey son The days of being able to win one in 15 seems like a golden period. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redordead Posted December 7, 2010 Author Share Posted December 7, 2010 Yip Daven MMG was a total catastrophe. That's what you get for shipping a mate into the job without properly checking your options ! Doesn't make Jimmy's final period any better. KGB, sadly you are correct Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
McMaster Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 Actually just after the 9-0 game by the soap dodgers the depressing journal were banding about starks name like he was a shoe in, before MMG got the boot. hmm . . . . Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyBiscuit Posted December 7, 2010 Share Posted December 7, 2010 Actually just after the 9-0 game by the soap dodgers the depressing journal were banding about starks name like he was a shoe in, before MMG got the boot. hmm . . . . It would suit some at the SFA if he wasn't there anymore, could believe they've been leaning on some of the "journos" Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jute Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 It would suit some at the SFA if he wasn't there anymore, could believe they've been leaning on some of the "journos" Would some include a guy who bares a passing resemblance to Harry Potter? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyBiscuit Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 Would some include a guy who bares a passing resemblance to Harry Potter? Definitely. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northfield Quine Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 Would some include a guy who bares a passing resemblance to Harry Potter? Jobs for the boys?? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Reekie_Red Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 Jimmy should've moved on from Aberdeen after the Bayern loss. That was his peak, and he would've gone down in history as being an Aberdeen legend for his team's exploits in Europe. Instead the club decided to renew his contract when he was already a grumpy fucker who couldnae gie a rats. I reckon we would've been able to attract much better managerial candidates if we'd let the Jimmies go in February 2008 and build on the good work he'd done up to that point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Harcus Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 Don't know where to start with that. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Torryloon Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 The media are there to sell a product, either in print or on TV. Many stories are just pure speculation. If Stark was supposed to be the hot favourite, why did they interview Brown, allegedly. It will be yet another embarrassing mess, just like the last time, when they waited until McGhee didn't get the Celtic job. Whoever eventually takes it, will be desperate, like Hughes, a second rater like Stark, or somebody who's a bit of a nutter, like Phil Brown. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madbadteacher Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 Reading Eric Black's bit in the retard today about Stark and Leighton I notice their "journo"(?) Anthony Haggerty giving Black the credit for our winner in Gothenburg! Typical shoddy work! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RDU_64 Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 It would suit some at the SFA if he wasn't there anymore, could believe they've been leaning on some of the "journos" Whats the story here? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobbyBiscuit Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 Whats the story here? It was in the Sunday Herald at the weekend that Levein and Stark hate each other, barely speak to one another. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TENEMENTFUNSTER Posted December 8, 2010 Share Posted December 8, 2010 So who's the cunt then? Levein or Stark? Either way, no fussed about Stark getting it. No ta. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ally s Posted December 10, 2010 Share Posted December 10, 2010 So who's the cunt then? Levein or Stark? Either way, no fussed about Stark getting it. No ta. Levein, fife cunt. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
️ Come on you Reds! ️
️ Come on you Reds! ️
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.