Jump to content

Sunday 12 May 2024:  kick-off 3pm

Scottish Premiership - Hibernian v Aberdeen

🔴⚪️ Come on you Reds! ⚪🔴

KWT15

Members
  • Posts

    17
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by KWT15

  1. 7 hours ago, tlg1903 said:

    Anyone else think Morris did alright in the brief time he was on? 

    Eh, no.  I think he proved once and for all that he has no place anywhere near an Aberdeen first team (should anyone have been in any doubt after the Motherwell game).

    • Like 3
  2. 2 hours ago, Panda said:

    Not all of it is speculation and the media may have more of a clue than you think.

    Appreciate that's how you earn your livelihood, but if this is the case, it is just as big a problem as any Board indecision/incompetence.  Anyone in the club that has sufficient clout to be that in the know, who is also providing/giving/selling info of that type to the media (or trusting others with it that are), is a HUGE issue and no amount of improvement in technical structure will change that.

  3. 82

    80

    79

    78

    77

    76

    75

    74 

    73 - Panda

    72 - Elgindon

    71

    70 - RedKev

    69 - 

    68

    67 - Nellie

    66 - MBT

    65 - Manc

    64 - Tyrant

    63 - Stewart

    62 - OxfordDon

    61 - Wee Toon Red

    60 - Danthedon

    59

    58 - Jute

    57

    56 - BigAl

    55 - KWT15

    54 

    53 - Tom_Widdows

    52

    51

    50

    49

    48

    47

    46

    45

    44

    43

    42

    41

    40

    39

    38

    37

    36

    35

    34

    33

    32

    31

    30

    29

    28

    27

    26

    25

    24

    23

    22

  4. 4 hours ago, RicoS321 said:

    The more of these incidents that go against the supposed victim the better in my opinion.

    I agree with this sentiment, and I know you've said you're not interested, but Beaton gave at least 3 free kicks for similar challenges to the Miovski one which occurred outside the box, but the one in the box is a dive?  Inconsistency is my issue with his decision.  And I think the Roos one was a penalty also - challenged (weakly) for the ball and didn't get it.  Is it soft? Yes, but it's a foul (in both cases).

  5. 5 hours ago, Panda said:

    Not that I'm tipping us to win, but it wouldn't surprise me if we put in a credible performance in Frankfurt because the way we're set up under Robson is suited to playing a team likely to dominate possession. It's when you give us the ball we embarrass ourselves.

    We'll press them, hound them, the likes of Duk will find space to run on the counter. Be a bit like the Celtic game which was our best performance of the season.

    Frankfurt would be better just letting us have the ball, laugh as we try and pass it at 100mph, make mistakes, and then just pick us off.

    Agree with this.  The obvious problem with building to this style of play is that 70% of our games (the 30% being Gruesome Twosome, sometimes Edinburgh GT wannabees & Europe), we will have the majority of possession and won't be in a position to play counter attacking football.

    Putting all our eggs in the Teklic basket looks like it is going to kill our domestic season, because there is no-one else showing so far that they have the nous or ability to create anything.  Clarkson is watching the ball sail over his head.  I've no idea what McGrath is meant to be offering.  And Shinnie's headless chicken act is exactly that without the Ramadani anchor giving the protection to make that workable.  Barron at least looked to play simple passes and keep the ball with a Dons shirt.  Start there and stop the Hollywood 50 yarders (into touch).  If we're playing Rubezic (and I don't think he's a lost cause yet), give him Barron or Devlin to pass short to - every time.  Jensen is not a left back, so let's not kid ourselves that is an option.

    Only positive from today was that Gartenmann looks like he can actually play this game - just need some of the rest of them to help him out.

  6. 49 minutes ago, Madbadteacher said:


    114

    100

    90

    80

    79

    78

    77

    76

    75

    74 

    73

    72

    71

    70

    69

    68 - KWT15

    67

    66 - MBT

    65

    64

    63

    62

    61

    60

    59

    58

    57

    56

    55

    54 

    53 - Tom_Widdows (Thats right, Im sticking with last season's prediction)

    52

    51

    50

    49

    48

    47

    46

    45

    44

    43

    42

    41

    40

    39

    38

    37

    36

    35

    34

    33

    32

    31

    30

    29

    28

    27

    26

    25

    24

    23

    22

    21

    20

    ----

     

  7. 17 hours ago, OrlandoDon said:

    Took me forever to find this thread, page 14!

    red tv international now 234.99. Is that close to double last year? Seem to recall around 119??? Quite a jump. I’ll grudgingly get it as obviously this is my season ticket, but ouch!!

    Last year was 179.99 for International, according to the email receipt I just looked up.  It's still a fair hike, but presentation/content has generally improved in quality over past 2-3 years and, like you say, it's the only way to see the Dandies for us that aren't there any more.  Hope the stream quality increase doesn't cause buffering issues, but I'd still say it's decent value for a "captive" service.

  8. 3 hours ago, tom_widdows said:

    Yes but was he the 3rd or even 4th keeper to play in that/ those season(s)?

    One for Irvine was against Hibs in Nov '91 when Snelders got sent off for decking Keith Wright (Irvine saved the pen), so yes for that in 91-92 (as Watt played the next game). 

    And you can add Peter Van de Ven to the other 3 in 90-91 (went in goals for injured Snelders at Easter Rd - I remember that one, as he spent a good bit of the time conducting the away end songs).

    • Like 2
  9. 1 hour ago, OrlandoDon said:

    Funny, I thought the same thing. Add to that, it did look like they had a fair penalty shout with the Stewart potential hand ball, maybe right before our second goal??

    I thought the first pen was soft, but Fitzwater didn't put up any complaint at all, which would tend to suggest he knew what he was doing.  2nd one, the defender clearly caught Duk's foot as he was sliding by and I'd have been raging if we didn't get the pen for it.  The Stewart one would likely have been given by VAR (so we got lucky there)

  10. IMHO, part of the reason that we've struggled as a creative unit over the last 3 seasons is the "undroppable" Ferguson.

    I'm maybe missing a lot of the off the ball work he does (as I am only watching from afar on RedTV), but for a guy with the supposed pedigree and admirers he has, there are a real dearth of games that I can remember where he has grabbed a game by the scruff of the neck and actually controlled it like a CM should (and like I'd expect of a "multi-million pound" player in the SPL).  Every other Dons midfielder has had to try to fit in around the game that he wants to play (sometimes deep lying, sometimes roving attacker), so they're ultimately not as effective (as he's often occupying the space they should be in).

    I do think he'd thrive with better players around him, but still believe we should've seen much more in a Dons shirt from a guy with aspirations to play in the EPL or Serie A.  I believe McLean, Shinnie and even Christie actually delivered more as Dons central midfield players than Ferguson has.  And I think Barron has shown more of the influence I'd expect from an international than Ferguson has in the 2nd half of this season.

    [Step back and prepare for flak...]

    • Like 1
  11. I noticed his name today, too, so had a dig about.  UEFA rules seem to be that no one owner can have a controlling interest over 2 clubs, but they can have an interest in more than one.  The BBC article says Crotty is a Director of Ineos, which wouldn't necessarily mean that he'd then become a director of Chelsea if Ineos bid was successful (but it seems likely).  Also not sure if Crotty is already a director at Nice (which Ineos also hold ownership stake in).  His investment in Aberdeen was (I think) reported as personal contribution, rather than on behalf of Ineos, which would likely also make a difference from a regulatory point of view.  It's a bit of a strange scenario, though...

    • Like 2
  12. 21 minutes ago, OrlandoDon said:

    Totally disagree, it’s a free kick curling towards goal and Ferguson is running straight back to his own goal. It’s a good free kick that challenges defenders and while Ferguson was shit here, Lewis must come out and attack it. With his frame and ability that’s a punched clearance all day long, but he needs to be brave. Which he’s not any more.

    For the 2nd, I am more with OrlandoDon here, as Lewis is seeing the ball coming in all the way and it ends up dropping about 8 yards out (with the defensive line held at the edge of the box for the kick).  Most worrying thing is that it was a virtual carbon copy of the (not Curtis Main) one against St Mirren and we still haven't sorted out whose responsibility it should be.

    • Like 1
  13. 6 hours ago, wee toon red said:

    I completely agree that our approach to youth development is hopeless, at least when the youngsters reach the fringes of the first team at any rate. There is a slightly less cynical view that the club aren't just paying lip service to committing to youth but they're actually just hopeless at it.

    If a kid isn't going to be in the team or match day squad by a certain age, but you want to hang on to them, then it's got to be a loan at that point. But that requires clubs to take a proper long-term view and I'm not sure we've been that kind of club for a long, long time.

    It's maybe a bit unfair to make that point now, considering we're posting on a thread about our players that are out on loan and the majority of the youth squad are now being sent out elsewhere to get development time.  If you want to point the finger, I think the guy who's just taken Campbell on loan is the one who should be on the end of it.  I've no argument that he failed the youth players (and the club) in this regard.

    • Like 3
  14. He was in the MLS Re-Entry draft list in December (players over 22 whose contract hadn't been extended by current club i.e. Atlanta).  The list said there was an option, so presumably the loan deal (which is with MLS, not Atlanta) could be extended if another MLS club wanted him.  He wasn't picked up in that draft, but is now made available to all MLS clubs on first come, first served basis.  No idea how long that remains open for.

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...